Low-Grade Clay as an Alkali-Activated Material

The potential application of alkali-activated material (AAM) as an alternative binder in concrete to reduce the environmental impact of cement production has now been established. However, as the production and availability of the primarily utilized waste materials, such as fly Ash and blast furnace slag, decrease, it is necessary to identify alternative materials. One such material is clay, which contains aluminosilicates and is abundantly available across the world. However, the reactivity of untreated low-grade clay can be low. Calcination can be used to activate clay, but this can consume significant energy. To address this issue, this paper reports the investigation of two calcination methodologies, utilizing low-temperature and high-temperature regimes of different durations, namely 24 h heating at 120 °C and 5 h at 750 °C and, and the results are compared with those of the mechanical performance of the AAM produced with untreated low-grade clay. The investigation used two alkali dosages, 10% and 15%, with an alkali modulus varying from 1.0 to 1.75. An increase in strength was observed with calcination of the clay at both 120 and 750 °C compared to untreated clay. Specimens with a dosage of 10% showed enhanced performance compared to those with 15%, with Alkali Modulus (AM) of 1.0 giving the optimal strength at 28 days for both dosages. The strengths achieved were in the range 10 to 20 MPa, suitable for use as concrete masonry brick. The conversion of Al (IV) is identified as the primary factor for the observed increase in strength.

[1]  Ipcc.  Global Warming of 1.5°C , 2022 .

[2]  D. Law,et al.  Alkali activation of mechanically activated low-grade clay , 2020 .

[3]  D. Law,et al.  Geopolymer synthesis using low-grade clays , 2020 .

[4]  M. Stefanidou,et al.  Long-Term Behavior and Durability of Alkali-Activated Clay Mortars , 2020, Materials.

[5]  M. Abdullah,et al.  Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer , 2020 .

[6]  M. Alshaaer.  Synthesis and characterization of self-healing geopolymer composite , 2020 .

[7]  Y. Pontikes,et al.  Advances in alkali-activation of clay minerals , 2020, Cement and Concrete Research.

[8]  I. Rostovsky,et al.  Optimization of geopolymers based on natural zeolite clinoptilolite by calcination and use of aluminate activators , 2020 .

[9]  J. Nakamatsu,et al.  Natural fibers as reinforcement additives for geopolymers – A review of potential eco-friendly applications to the construction industry , 2020 .

[10]  C. Leonelli,et al.  Microstructural and mechanical properties of poly(sialate-siloxo) networks obtained using metakaolins from kaolin and halloysite as aluminosilicate sources: A comparative study , 2020, Applied Clay Science.

[11]  Q. Wang,et al.  Geopolymerization of halloysite via alkali-activation: Dependence of microstructures on precalcination , 2020 .

[12]  M. Slaný,et al.  Synthesis, Property and Mechanism Analysis of a Novel Polyhydroxy Organic Amine Shale Hydration Inhibitor , 2020, Minerals.

[13]  A. Soukup,et al.  Low viscosity metakaolinite based geopolymer binders , 2020 .

[14]  S. Setunge,et al.  Compressive strength and microstructure evolution of low calcium brown coal fly ash-based geopolymer , 2019, Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials.

[15]  D. Adak,et al.  Strength and Durability Performance of Fly Ash–Based Process-Modified Geopolymer Concrete , 2019, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.

[16]  G. Gluth,et al.  Comparison of calcined illitic clays (brick clays) and low-grade kaolinitic clays as supplementary cementitious materials , 2019, Materials and Structures.

[17]  L. Jankovič,et al.  Structural characterization of organo-montmorillonites prepared from a series of primary alkylamines salts: Mid-IR and near-IR study , 2019, Applied Clay Science.

[18]  Y. Araki,et al.  Reaction, Phases, and Microstructure of Fly Ash-Based Alkali-Activated Materials , 2019, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology.

[19]  P. Walker,et al.  Alkali activation behaviour of un-calcined montmorillonite and illite clay minerals , 2018, Applied Clay Science.

[20]  M. Abdullah,et al.  Clay-Based Materials in Geopolymer Technology , 2018, Cement Based Materials.

[21]  S. Bouaziz,et al.  Effects of metakaolin addition on geopolymer prepared from natural kaolinitic clay , 2017 .

[22]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Effect of Element Distribution on Strength in Fly Ash Geopolymers , 2017 .

[23]  C. Leonelli,et al.  The corrosion of kaolinite by iron minerals and the effects on geopolymerization , 2017 .

[24]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Long term permeation properties of different fly ash geopolymer concretes , 2016 .

[25]  A. Boyle,et al.  Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers , 2016 .

[26]  Ilaria Capasso,et al.  Thermally treated clay sediments as geopolymer source material , 2015 .

[27]  M. Verkuijlen,et al.  FT-IR and 29Si-NMR for evaluating aluminium–silicate precursors for geopolymers , 2015 .

[28]  David W. Law,et al.  Long term durability properties of class F fly ash geopolymer concrete , 2015 .

[29]  Monika Šupová,et al.  The identification of geopolymer affinity in specific cases of clay materials , 2014 .

[30]  Andrew C. Heath,et al.  Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers , 2014 .

[31]  S. Shen,et al.  Factors influencing strength development in clay–fly ash geopolymer , 2013 .

[32]  C. Kaps,et al.  Effect of thermal pre-treatment conditions of common clays on the performance of clay-based geopolymeric binders , 2013 .

[33]  Hao Wang,et al.  Quantitative study of the reactivity of fly ash in geopolymerization by FTIR , 2012 .

[34]  John L. Provis,et al.  Engineering and durability properties of concretes based on alkali-activated granulated blast furnac , 2012 .

[35]  M. Grutzeck,et al.  Comparing the performances of bricks made with natural clay and clay activated by calcination and addition of sodium silicate , 2011 .

[36]  Ali Nazari,et al.  Properties of geopolymer with seeded fly ash and rice husk bark ash , 2011 .

[37]  Á. Palomo,et al.  Compatibility studies between N-A-S-H and C-A-S-H gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O , 2011 .

[38]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanical activation of fly ash: Effect on reaction, structure and properties of resulting geopolymer , 2011 .

[39]  P. Raiteri,et al.  Dehydroxylation of Kaolinite to Metakaolin - A Molecular Dynamics Study , 2011 .

[40]  Maria Izquierdo,et al.  X-ray powder diffraction-based method for the determination of the glass content and mineralogy of coal (co)-combustion fly ashes , 2010 .

[41]  Pavel Rovnaník,et al.  Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer , 2010 .

[42]  A. Buchwald,et al.  The suitability of thermally activated illite/smectite clay as raw material for geopolymer binders , 2009 .

[43]  Henri Van Damme,et al.  Geopolymers from Algerian metakaolin. Influence of secondary minerals , 2009 .

[44]  Z. Wen,et al.  Preparation and performance of geopolymers , 2008 .

[45]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Alkali-activated binders: A review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture , 2008 .

[46]  J. Davidovits.  Geopolymer chemistry and applications , 2008 .

[47]  Kwesi Sagoe-Crentsil,et al.  Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures , 2007 .

[48]  J. Deventer,et al.  Do Geopolymers Actually Contain Nanocrystalline Zeolites? A Reexamination of Existing Results , 2005 .

[49]  B. Vijaya Rangan,et al.  ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE , 2004 .

[50]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Effects of curing temperature and NaOH addition on hydration and strength development of clinker-free CKD-fly ash binders , 2004 .

[51]  Raffaele Cioffi,et al.  Optimization of geopolymer synthesis by calcination and polycondensation of a kaolinitic residue , 2003 .

[52]  P. Whitfield,et al.  Quantitative Rietveld analysis of the amorphous content in cements and clinkers , 2003 .

[53]  R. Prins,et al.  Flexible Aluminum Coordination in Alumino−Silicates. Structure of Zeolite H−USY and Amorphous Silica−Alumina , 2003 .

[54]  F. Puertas,et al.  Mineralogical and microstructural characterisation of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes , 2003 .

[55]  J. Deventer,et al.  Microstructural characterisation of geopolymers synthesised from kaolinite/stilbite mixtures using XRD, MAS-NMR, SEM/EDX, TEM/EDX, and HREM , 2002 .

[56]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF COMPOSITION AND TEMPERATURE ON THE PROPERTIES OF FLY ASH- AND KAOLINITE -BASED GEOPOLYMERS , 2002 .

[57]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated slag concrete , 2001 .

[58]  J. Phair,et al.  Effect of silicate activator pH on the leaching and material characteristics of waste-based inorganic polymers , 2001 .

[59]  D. Law,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of 100% clay based geopolymer concrete , 2017 .

[60]  S. Horpibulsuk,et al.  Development of Low Cost Geopolymer from Calcined Sedimentary Clay , 2015 .

[61]  K. Uli,et al.  NMR Study of Aluminium Coordination in Clays , 2013 .

[62]  Karen Scrivener,et al.  The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: A comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite , 2011 .

[63]  Andi Arham Adam,et al.  Strength and durability properties of alkali activated slag and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete , 2009 .

[64]  Hui-sheng Shi,et al.  Performance and Mechanism of Alkali-Activated Complex Binders of High-Ca Fly Ash and Other Ca-Bearing Materials , 2009 .

[65]  Emil Makovicky,et al.  Thermal treatment and pozzolanic activity of Na- and Ca-montmorillonite , 1996 .