Pairwise Sequential Randomization and Its Properties

In comparative studies, such as in causal inference and clinical trials, balancing important covariates is often one of the most important concerns for both efficient and credible comparison. However, chance imbalance still exists in many randomized experiments. This phenomenon of covariate imbalance becomes much more serious as the number of covariates $p$ increases. To address this issue, we introduce a new randomization procedure, called pairwise sequential randomization (PSR). The proposed method allocates the units sequentially and adaptively, using information on the current level of imbalance and the incoming unit's covariate. With a large number of covariates or a large number of units, the proposed method shows substantial advantages over the traditional methods in terms of the covariate balance, estimation accuracy, and computational time, making it an ideal technique in the era of big data. The proposed method attains the optimal covariate balance, in the sense that the estimated treatment effect under the proposed method attains its minimum variance asymptotically. Also the proposed method is widely applicable in both causal inference and clinical trials. Numerical studies and real data analysis provide further evidence of the advantages of the proposed method.

[1]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  The Arrangement of Field Experiments , 1992 .

[2]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Testing Hypotheses of Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials , 2015 .

[3]  D. Rubin For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis , 2008, 0811.1640.

[4]  Wenle Zhao,et al.  Quantifying the cost in power of ignoring continuous covariate imbalances in clinical trial randomization. , 2011, Contemporary clinical trials.

[5]  James Frane,et al.  A Method of Biased Coin Randomization, Its Implementation, and Its Validation , 1998 .

[6]  Kari Frazer Lock,et al.  Rerandomization to Improve Covariate Balance in Randomized Experiments , 2011 .

[7]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Affinely Invariant Matching Methods with Ellipsoidal Distributions , 1992 .

[8]  Dana Chandler,et al.  Breaking Monotony with Meaning: Motivation in Crowdsourcing Markets , 2012, ArXiv.

[9]  Kari Lock Morgan,et al.  Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments , 2012, 1207.5625.

[10]  Miriam Bruhn,et al.  In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments , 2008 .

[11]  C B Begg,et al.  A treatment allocation procedure for sequential clinical trials. , 1980, Biometrics.

[12]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[13]  Donald B Rubin,et al.  Rerandomization to Balance Tiers of Covariates , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[14]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review. , 1974 .

[15]  Zhenjun Ma,et al.  Adaptive randomization for balancing over covariates , 2014 .

[16]  L. J. Wei,et al.  An Application of an Urn Model to the Design of Sequential Controlled Clinical Trials , 1978 .

[17]  D R Taves,et al.  Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups , 1974, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  Yunzhi Lin,et al.  Balancing continuous and categorical baseline covariates in sequential clinical trials using the area between empirical cumulative distribution functions , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Balancing continuous covariates based on Kernel densities. , 2013, Contemporary clinical trials.

[20]  F. Hu,et al.  Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization , 2012, 1210.4666.

[21]  R. Horwitz The planning of observational studies of human populations , 1979 .

[22]  Richard L. Smith Properties of Biased Coin Designs in Sequential Clinical Trials , 1984 .

[23]  Richard L. Tweedie,et al.  Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability , 1993, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[24]  C. Blumberg Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction , 2016 .

[25]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[26]  Marion K Campbell,et al.  The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[27]  David A. Freedman,et al.  On regression adjustments to experimental data , 2008, Adv. Appl. Math..

[28]  Maroussa Zagoraiou,et al.  The covariate-adaptive biased coin design for balancing clinical trials in the presence of prognostic factors , 2011 .

[29]  D. Taves,et al.  Rank-Minimization for balanced assignment of subjects in clinical trials. , 2010, Contemporary clinical trials.

[30]  F K Hoehler,et al.  Balancing allocation of subjects in biomedical research: a minimization strategy based on ranks. , 1987, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[31]  Richard L. Smith Sequential Treatment Allocation Using Biased Coin Designs , 1984 .

[32]  Adam Kapelner,et al.  Matching on‐the‐fly: Sequential allocation with higher power and efficiency , 2014, Biometrics.