Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: Building Social Relations with Learners

This study examined the potential of pedagogical agents as learning companions (PALs) to build social relations with learners and, consequently, to motivate learning. The study investigated the impact of PAL affect (positive vs. negative vs. neutral), PAL gender (male vs. female), and learner gender (male vs. female) on learners' social judgments, motivation, and learning in a controlled experiment. Participants were 142 college students in a computer-literacy course. Overall, the results indicated the interaction effects of PAL affect, PAL gender, and learner gender on learners' social judgments (p <.001). PAL affect impacted learners' social judgments (p <.001) and motivation (p <.05). PAL gender influenced motivation (p <.01) and recall of learning (p <.05). Learner gender influenced recall of learning (p <.01). The implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender and Social Influence , 2001 .

[2]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural Contexts for Teaching and Learning , 2003 .

[3]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[4]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Affective Influences on Social Information Processing , 2000 .

[5]  Michael J. Owren,et al.  Vocal acoustics in emotional intelligence. , 2002 .

[6]  Gordon I. McCalla,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Education - Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2005, July 18-22, 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands , 2005, AIED.

[7]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. , 2003 .

[8]  Antonio R. Damasio,et al.  The interaction of affect and cognition: A neurobiological perspective. , 2000 .

[9]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Ramon Lewis,et al.  Classroom discipline and student responsibility:: The students’ view , 2001 .

[11]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[12]  Yanghee Kim.  Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2004 .

[13]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- Tin Chen, Bargh / Consequences of Automatic Evaluation Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 2022 .

[14]  Sid Bourke,et al.  Assessing affective characteristics in the schools , 1981 .

[15]  Leslie R. Brody.  Gender, Emotion, and the Family , 1999 .

[16]  Clark Hubbard,et al.  Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Account , 1997 .

[17]  Ruth Aylett,et al.  Socially Intelligent Agents - Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots , 2003, J. Documentation.

[18]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Mood and Social Memory , 2000 .

[19]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The nature of characters in interactive worlds and the oz project , 1992 .

[20]  Yanghee Kim.  Learners’ expectations on the desirable characteristics of learning companions , 2004 .

[21]  Carolyn Saarni,et al.  Epilogue: Emotion communication and relationship context , 2001 .

[22]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Facial expression of emotion. , 2003 .

[23]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Affective Cues and Processing Strategy: Color-Coded Examination Forms Influence Performance , 1998 .