The Duality in Spatial Stiffness and Compliance as Realized in Parallel and Serial Elastic Mechanisms

Spatial elastic behavior is characterized by a 6X6 positive definite matrix, the spatial stiffness matrix, or its inverse, the spatial compliance matrix. Previously, the structure of a spatial stiffness matrix and its realization using a parallel elastic system have been addressed. This paper extends those results to the analysis and realization of a spatial compliance matrix using a serial mechanism and identifies the duality in spatial stiffness and compliance associated with parallel and serial elastic mechanisms. We show that, a spatial compliance matrix can be decomposed into a set of rank-1 compliance matrices, each of which can be realized with an elastic joint in a serial mechanism. To realize a general spatial compliance, the serial mechanism must contain joints that couple the translational and rotational motion along/about an axis. The structure of a spatial compliance matrix can be uniquely interpreted by a 6-joint serial elastic mechanism whose geometry is obtained from the eigenscrew decomposition of the compliance matrix. The results obtained from the analysis of spatial compliant behavior and its realization in a serial mechanism are compared with those obtained for spatial stiffness behavior and its realization in a parallel mechanism.

[1]  Vijay R. Kumar,et al.  On the 6 × 6 cartesian stiffness matrix for three-dimensional motions , 1998 .

[2]  Rodney G. Roberts.  Minimal realization of a spatial stiffness matrix with simple springs connected in parallel , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  H. Lipkin,et al.  Structure of Robot Compliance , 1993 .

[4]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  Achieving an Arbitrary Spatial Stiffness with Springs Connected in Parallel , 1998 .

[5]  Shuguang Huang.  The analysis and synthesis of spatial compliance , 1998 .

[6]  Imin Kao,et al.  Conservative Congruence Transformation for Joint and Cartesian Stiffness Matrices of Robotic Hands and Fingers , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  Global stiffness modeling of a class of simple compliant couplings , 1993 .

[8]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  A Classification of Spatial Stiffness Based on the Degree of Translational–Rotational Coupling , 2001 .

[9]  Harvey Lipkin,et al.  Synthesis of Cartesian stiffness for robotic applications , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[10]  Josip Loncaric,et al.  Geometrical analysis of compliant mechanisms in robotics , 1985 .

[11]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  The bounds and realization of spatial compliances achieved with simple serial elastic mechanisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Harvey Lipkin,et al.  A Classification of Robot Compliance , 1993 .

[13]  P. Breedveld,et al.  Modeling of Elastically Coupled Bodies: Part II—Exponential and Generalized Coordinate Methods , 1998 .

[14]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  Kinestatic Control: A Novel Theory for Simultaneously Regulating Force and Displacement , 1991 .

[15]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  The eigenscrew decomposition of spatial stiffness matrices , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  P. Breedveld,et al.  Modeling of elastically coupled bodies : Part i-General theory and geometric potential function method , 1998 .

[17]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  The bounds and realization of spatial stiffnesses achieved with simple springs connected in parallel , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..