Impacts of first and second labour stages on Hurst parameter based intrapartum fetal heart rate analysis

Intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR), routinely monitored in daily obstetrical practice, enables early detection of fetal asphyxia and thus prevention of labour adverse outcomes. FHR variability (FHRV) constitutes an essential characterization of fetal well-being; fetuses with large FHRV are unlikely to be at risk of brain injury. This study investigates the impacts of labour first and second stages on the characterization of FHR temporal dynamics as well as on the discrimination of healthy from acidotic fetuses. FHR temporal dynamics are quantified using Hurst parameter, H, practically estimated within a wavelet framework. Analyses are performed on first and second stages, over a large (3049 records) and well documented database, collected at Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, in Lyon, France. It is observed that Ĥ, for healthy fetuses, remains constant along first stage and then significantly increases during second stage; while, for acidotic fetuses, Ĥ increases to larger values earlier within first stage. This may indicate that the defense mechanism classically at work during second stage as a reaction to excessive stress, is already in use during first stage for acidotic fetuses. Detection performance curves (ROC) also show that second stage Ĥ permits slightly better discrimination of healthy from acidotic fetuses, compared to first stage Ĥ.

[1]  O. Dupuis,et al.  La surveillance fœtale pendant l’expulsion , 2008 .

[2]  Quantitative comparison of entropy analysis of fetal heart rate variability related to the different stages of labor. , 2014, Early human development.

[3]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Scattering Transform for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Fractal Analysis: A Case-Control Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Austin Ugwumadu,et al.  Understanding cardiotocographic patterns associated with intrapartum fetal hypoxia and neurologic injury. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[6]  Patrice Abry,et al.  A Wavelet-Based Joint Estimator of the Parameters of Long-Range Dependence , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  S J Payne,et al.  Phase‐rectified signal averaging for intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is related to acidaemia at birth , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  J. Hauth,et al.  Second‐Stage Fetal Heart Rate Abnormalities and Type of Neonatal Acidemia , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Pascal Gaucherand,et al.  Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[11]  A. Tranquilli Fetal heart rate in the second stage of labor: recording, reading, interpreting and acting , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[12]  O. Dupuis,et al.  [Fetal monitoring during the active second stage of labor]. , 2008, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[13]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.