Respiratory resistance measured by an airflow perturbation device.

The airflow perturbation device (APD) is an instrument for the measurement of respiratory resistance. The APD is small, lightweight, fast and requires no special breathing manoeuvres. Airflow perturbation determines resistance by superimposing a periodic signal onto spontaneous breathing with a variable resistance device. Respiratory impedance is the ratio of magnitude of pressure perturbation to magnitude of flow perturbation, and respiratory resistance is the in-phase portion of respiratory impedance. The APD was tested to determine its responses to repeated resistance measurements and to changes in resistance. A mechanical model test showed that the APD could detect increased resistance levels, but overestimated resistance when resistance increased with flow. Tests with human subjects showed that the APD gave results consistent from day to day, was able to detect added resistances, and gave resistance values correlated with airway resistance values obtained by body plethysmography. Accelerometers placed on the chests of the subjects showed that perturbations extend to the chest surface. Thus, the APD must measure total respiratory resistance.

[1]  Arthur T. Johnson Conversion Between Plethysmograph and Perturbational Airways Resistance Measurements , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  B. Suki,et al.  Lung impedance in healthy humans measured by forced oscillations from 0.01 to 0.1 Hz. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  R. Peslin,et al.  Variability, reproducibility and observer difference of body plethysmographic measurements. , 1982, Clinical physiology.

[4]  J. H. Comroe,et al.  A new method for measuring airway resistance in man using a body plethysmograph: values in normal subjects and in patients with respiratory disease. , 1956, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  B J Sobol A simple, rapid technique for assessing airway resistance during quiet breathing. , 1970, The American review of respiratory disease.

[6]  H Lorino,et al.  Forced oscillation technique vs spirometry to assess bronchodilatation in patients with asthma and COPD. , 1995, Chest.

[7]  Arthur T. Johnson,et al.  Model analysis of the airflow perturbation device , 1985 .

[8]  Arthur T. Johnson,et al.  Airflow Resistance of Conscious Boars , 1983 .

[9]  G M Barnas,et al.  Impedance and relative displacements of relaxed chest wall up to 4 Hz. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  E D Michaelson,et al.  Pulmonary mechanics by spectral analysis of forced random noise. , 1975, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  D. Stǎnescu Was it just our problem, or yours too? errors in body plethysmography, in infants, children, and adults , 1991, Pediatric pulmonology.

[12]  J. Hochheimer,et al.  Airflow Perturbation Device for Measuring Airways Resistance of Humans and Animals , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  K P Van de Woestijne,et al.  Mechanical properties of lungs and chest wall during spontaneous breathing. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[14]  Arthur T. Johnson,et al.  Relation Between Limiting Exhalation Flow Rate and Lung Volume , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.