Species Selection Maintains Self-Incompatibility

Incompatible Self-Compatibility Macroevolutionary processes driving species differences in diversification rates are important in explaining the variation we see in nature, but the extent of this process and how much the traits within a single species can drive changes in the diversification rate are unknown. Goldberg et al. (p. 493; see the Perspective by Wright and Barrett) analyzed the phylogenetics of the plant family Solanaceae and found that rates of extinction are greater for self-pollinating species than outbreeding species. Species-level selection against the deleterious effects of inbreeding may explain why self-fertilization, despite its short-term evolutionary advantages, has not spread to become more common in the flowering plants. Self-incompatibility in a family of plants is associated with appreciably higher rates of speciation. Identifying traits that affect rates of speciation and extinction and, hence, explain differences in species diversity among clades is a major goal of evolutionary biology. Detecting such traits is especially difficult when they undergo frequent transitions between states. Self-incompatibility, the ability of hermaphrodites to enforce outcrossing, is frequently lost in flowering plants, enabling self-fertilization. We show, however, that in the nightshade plant family (Solanaceae), species with functional self-incompatibility diversify at a significantly higher rate than those without it. The apparent short-term advantages of potentially self-fertilizing individuals are therefore offset by strong species selection, which favors obligate outcrossing.

[1]  J. Busch,et al.  On the Evolution of Self‐Fertilization in a Metapopulation , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[2]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[3]  T. Bonney More Letters of Charles Darwin A Record of his Work in a Series of hitherto Unpublished Letters , 1903, Nature.

[4]  V. Franklin-Tong Self-incompatibility in flowering plants : evolution, diversity, and mechanisms , 2008 .

[5]  A. Clark,et al.  Polymorphism at the self-incompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Lewontin The Units of Selection , 1970, The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory.

[7]  S. Gould,et al.  Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. , 1982, Science.

[8]  J. Busch,et al.  The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting. , 2008, Trends in plant science.

[9]  H. Owen,et al.  New Phytol , 2008 .

[10]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. Maddison CONFOUNDING ASYMMETRIES IN EVOLUTIONARY DIVERSIFICATION AND CHARACTER CHANGE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  R. Lande,et al.  Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[13]  S. Kalisz,et al.  The Evolutionary Enigma of Mixed Mating Systems in Plants: Occurrence, Theoretical Explanations, and Empirical Evidence , 2005 .

[14]  D. Rabosky,et al.  Reinventing species selection with molecular phylogenies. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  G. Stebbins Self Fertilization and Population Variability in the Higher Plants , 1957, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Richard G FitzJohn,et al.  Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. , 2009, Systematic biology.

[17]  E. Goldberg,et al.  On Phylogenetic Tests of Irreversible Evolution , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  B. Igić,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF PLANT MATING SYSTEMS: STUDY BIAS AGAINST OBLIGATELY OUTCROSSING SPECIES , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  P. Raven Flowering Plants , 1897, Nature.

[20]  R. Lande,et al.  LOSS OF GAMETOPHYTIC SELF‐INCOMPATIBILITY WITH EVOLUTION OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  M. Sanderson,et al.  ABSOLUTE DIVERSIFICATION RATES IN ANGIOSPERM CLADES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[23]  L. Bohs,et al.  Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Hamrick,et al.  Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species , 1996 .

[25]  K. Holsinger,et al.  S-RNase-mediated gametophytic self-incompatibility is ancestral in eudicots. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  K. Karoly,et al.  Dioecy and Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility: Reproductive Efficiency Revisited , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Peter E Midford,et al.  Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[28]  C. Darwin,et al.  More letters of Charles Darwin. A record of his work in a series of hitherto unpublished letters, ed. by Francis Darwin ... and A.C. Seward ... , 1903 .

[29]  G. Williams,et al.  Natural selection : domains, levels, and challenges. , 1994 .

[30]  A. Brown,et al.  Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  David Jablonski,et al.  Species Selection: Theory and Data , 2008 .

[33]  L. Bohs,et al.  Historical inferences from the self‐incompatibility locus , 2003 .

[34]  T. Taylor,et al.  The Role of Self-Incompatibility and Sexual Selection in the Gymnosperm-Angiosperm Transition: A Hypothesis , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[35]  S. Barrett Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.