Using participation factors to improve the consistency and accuracy of Prony analysis for voltage stability monitoring applications

Steadily increasing demand for electricity has led to today's electric power networks often being stressed to their stability limits. Improved methods of stability monitoring are needed to manage this increased stress. Modal analysis could provide a relatively lightweight assessment of the stability of the system but some method is needed to accurately determine the modal content of the power system. Prony analysis has been suggested as a means to determine a power system's modal content directly from signals within the system. However, Prony analysis has proved to be difficult to implement due to the complexities in its parameter selection. This work addresses that difficulty by numerically exploring a novel role for modal participation factors as a way to select which signals to monitor and analyze with Prony analysis. The results show that using participation factors in this way can greatly improve the accuracy of the estimates generated by Prony analysis. The resulting accurate estimates can be used to provide critical early warning of impending voltage instability in the system.

[1]  J. F. Hauer,et al.  Application of Prony analysis to the determination of modal content and equivalent models for measured power system response , 1991 .

[2]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  F. Schweppe,et al.  Selective Modal Analysis with Applications to Electric Power Systems, PART I: Heuristic Introduction , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[4]  Tianshu Bi,et al.  Measurements get together , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[5]  B. Gao,et al.  Voltage Stability Evaluation Using Modal Analysis , 1992, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[6]  I. Dobson,et al.  Voltage collapse in power systems , 1992, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.

[7]  Wael A. Hashlamoun,et al.  New Results on Modal Participation Factors: Revealing a Previously Unknown Dichotomy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  P. Kundur,et al.  Towards the development of a systematic approach for voltage stability assessment of large-scale power systems , 1996 .

[9]  M. A. Johnson,et al.  Prony analysis and power system stability-some recent theoretical and applications research , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).

[10]  F. Milano,et al.  An open source power system analysis toolbox , 2005, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[11]  P. Kundur,et al.  Definition and classification of power system stability IEEE/CIGRE joint task force on stability terms and definitions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  C. E. Grund,et al.  Comparison of Prony and eigenanalysis for power system control design , 1993 .

[13]  Chandrabhan Sharma,et al.  Determination of Power System Voltage Stability Using Modal Analysis , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives.