Interruptible physical transmission contracts for congestion management

This paper presents a novel congestion management protocol applicable for both pure-bilateral and hybrid market structure. The mechanism is based on an interruptible physical transmission contract, which guarantees physical access to the transmission network users and provides financial incentives for the bilateral contract holders to forfeit the physical access to the transmission network. The contract specifies a financial reimbursement payable to the insured if the system operator dispatch requires a curtailment of a bilateral contract involving an injection into and withdrawal of power at a specified set of nodes. The insurer is compensated in the form of an insurance premium for providing the service. The contract is structured such that the reimbursement payable to the insured party equals the actual loss incurred so that the insured party is "made whole" with the insurance payment. Similarly, when the insurer is the system operator itself, it tries to dispatch the generators such that the aggregate insurance reimbursements payable to the insured parties is minimized. In this way, the transmission contract mechanism ensures that a near optimal curtailment policy coincides with the efficient dispatch in the system.

[1]  F. Ashcroft,et al.  VIII. References , 1955 .

[2]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Markets and pricing for interruptible electric power , 1993 .

[3]  John C. Hull,et al.  Numerical Procedures for Implementing Term Structure Models I , 1994 .

[4]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[5]  William W. Hogan,et al.  Transmission capacity reservations implemented through a spot market with transmission congestion contracts , 1996 .

[6]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Priority Network Access Pricing for Electric Power , 2001 .

[7]  Richard E. Wilson Implementation of priority insurance in power exchange markets , 1997 .

[8]  Eduardo S. Schwartz The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging , 1997 .

[9]  F. Galiana,et al.  Power systems restructuring : engineering and economics , 1998 .

[10]  Z. Alaywan,et al.  California electric restructuring; a broad description of the development of the California ISO , 1998 .

[11]  Chien-Ning Yu,et al.  Hierarchical congestion management for a deregulated power industry , 1999 .

[12]  Eric Allen,et al.  Providing for transmission in times of scarcity: an ISO cannot do it all , 1999 .

[13]  WILLIAM W. HOGAN FLOWGATE RIGHTS AND WRONGS , 2000 .

[14]  S. Oren,et al.  Flow-Based Transmission Rights and Congestion Management , 2000 .

[15]  Marija Ilic,et al.  Bid-based Stochastic Model for Electricity Prices: The Impact of Fundamental Drivers on Market Dynamics , 2000 .

[16]  Yong Tae Yoon Electric power network economics: designing principles for a for-profit independent transmission company and underlying architectures for reliability , 2001 .