Survey research aims to collect robust and reliable data from respondents. However, despite researchers’ efforts in designing questionnaires, survey instruments may be imperfect, and question structure not as clear as could be, thus creating a burden for respondents. If it were possible to detect such problems, this knowledge could be used to predict problems in a questionnaire during pretesting, inform real-time interventions through responsive questionnaire design, or to indicate and correct measurement error after the fact. Previous research has used paradata, specifically response times, to detect difficulties and help improve user experience and data quality. Today, richer data sources are available, for example, movements respondents make with their mouse, as an additional detailed indicator for the respondent–survey interaction. This article uses machine learning techniques to explore the predictive value of mouse-tracking data regarding a question’s difficulty. We use data from a survey on respondents’ employment history and demographic information, in which we experimentally manipulate the difficulty of several questions. Using measures derived from mouse movements, we predict whether respondents have answered the easy or difficult version of a question, using and comparing several state-of-the-art supervised learning methods. We have also developed a personalization method that adjusts for respondents’ baseline mouse behavior and evaluate its performance. For all three manipulated survey questions, we find that including the full set of mouse movement measures and accounting for individual differences in these measures improve prediction performance over response-time-only models.
[1]
F. Conrad,et al.
Use and non-use of clarification features in web surveys
,
2006
.
[2]
H. Chernoff,et al.
Why significant variables aren’t automatically good predictors
,
2015,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[3]
E. Leeuw,et al.
To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys.
,
2005
.
[4]
Ting Yan,et al.
Assessing Quality of Answers to a Global Subjective Well-being Question Through Response Times.
,
2015,
Survey research methods.
[5]
F. Conrad,et al.
Disfluencies and Gaze Aversion in Unreliable Responses to Survey Questions
,
2012
.
[6]
Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.
Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression
,
2005
.
[7]
Mick P. Couper,et al.
The Future of Modes of Data Collection
,
2011
.