Effects of restoration and reflooding on soil denitrification in a leveed Midwestern floodplain.

River floodplains have the potential to remove nitrate from water through denitrification, the anaerobic microbial conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas. An important factor in this process is the interaction of river water with floodplain soil; however, many rivers have been disconnected from their historic floodplains by levees. To test the effect of reflooding a degraded floodplain on nitrate removal, we studied changes in soil denitrification rates on the Baraboo River floodplain in Wisconsin, USA, as it underwent restoration. Prior to this study, the site had been leveed, drained, and farmed for more than 50 years. In late fall 2002, the field drainage system was removed, and a gate structure was installed to allow controlled flooding of this site with river water. Soil moisture was extremely variable among zones and months and reflected local weather. Soil organic matter was stable over the study period with differences occurring along the elevation gradient. High soil nitrate concentrations occurred in dry, relatively organic-poor soil samples and, conversely, all samples with high moisture soils characterized by low nitrate. We measured denitrification in static cores and potential denitrification in bulk samples amended with carbon and nitrogen, one year before and two years following the manipulation. Denitrification rates showed high temporal and spatial variability. Static core rates of individual sites ranged widely (from 0.00 to 16.7 microg N2O-N x [kg soil](-1) x h(-1), mean +/- SD = 1.10 +/- 3.02), and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) rates were similar with a slightly higher mean (from 0.00 to 15.0 microg N2O-N x [kg soil](-1) x h(-1), 1.41 +/- 1.98). Denitrification was not well-correlated with soil nitrate, organic matter content, or moisture levels, the three parameters typically thought to control denitrification. Static core denitrification rates were not significantly different across years, and DEA rates decreased slightly the second year after restoration. These results demonstrate that restored agricultural soil has the potential for denitrification, but that floodplain restoration did not immediately improve this potential. Future floodplain restorations should be designed to test alternative methods of increasing denitrification.

[1]  M. Koschorreck,et al.  Nitrogen dynamics in seasonally flooded soils in the Amazon floodplain , 2003, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[2]  B. Griffiths,et al.  Spatial distribution and successional pattern of microbial activity and micro-faunal populations on decomposing barley roots , 1996 .

[3]  N. Fierer,et al.  Effects of drying–rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations , 2002 .

[4]  M. Firestone,et al.  Environmental controls on denitrifying communities and denitrification rates: insights from molecular methods. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  N. Hofstra,et al.  Denitrification in Agricultural Soils: Summarizing Published Data and Estimating Global Annual Rates , 2005, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[6]  H. Birks,et al.  Dispersal Limitations Matter for Microbial Morphospecies , 2006, Science.

[7]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  Methods for measuring denitrification: diverse approaches to a difficult problem. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  D. Hey.  Nitrogen Farming: Harvesting a Different Crop , 2002 .

[9]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship , 2000 .

[10]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Vegetation and environmental conditions in recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region of the USA , 1996, Vegetatio.

[11]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Biogeochemical Hot Spots and Hot Moments at the Interface of Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems , 2003, Ecosystems.

[12]  R. Naiman,et al.  Potential Denitrification Activity in the Landscape of a Western Alaska Drainage Basin , 2003, Ecosystems.

[13]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Patterns of denitrification rates in European alluvial soils under various hydrological regimes , 2007 .

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[15]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[16]  Policy Division.  Our Common Journey:: A Transition Toward Sustainability , 1999 .

[17]  F. A. Richards,et al.  Determination of nitrate in sea water by cadmium-copper reduction to nitrite , 1967, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[18]  W. Richardson,et al.  Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux , 2004 .

[19]  D. Moyer,et al.  BIOGEOCHEMICAL AND METABOLIC RESPONSES TO THE FLOOD PULSE IN A SEMIARID FLOODPLAIN , 2005 .

[20]  M. Palmer,et al.  Restoring watersheds project by project: trends in Chesapeake Bay tributary restoration , 2005 .

[21]  M. Baker,et al.  Hydrological variability, organic matter supply and denitrification in the Garonne River ecosystem , 2004 .

[22]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Creating riverine wetlands: Ecological succession, nutrient retention, and pulsing effects , 2005 .

[23]  K. Paustian,et al.  Influence of dry–wet cycles on the interrelationship between aggregate, particulate organic matter, and microbial community dynamics , 2001 .

[24]  H. Olde Venterink,et al.  Role of active floodplains for nutrient retention in the river Rhine. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  R. K. Hubbard,et al.  Denitrification in a Restored Riparian Forest Wetland , 1995 .

[26]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils , 1993 .

[27]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Do dams and levees impact nitrogen cycling? Simulating the effects of flood alterations on floodplain denitrification , 2005 .

[28]  K. Ritz,et al.  Tillage, habitat space and function of soil microbes , 2000 .

[29]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts , 2005, Science.

[30]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance , 1997 .

[31]  D. Baldwin,et al.  The effects of sediment desiccation on the potential for nitrification, denitrification, and methanogenesis in an Australian reservoir , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  D. Stoeckel,et al.  Seasonal nutrient dynamics of forested floodplain soil influenced by microtopography and depth , 2001 .

[33]  F. Hole.  Soils of Wisconsin , 1978 .

[34]  R. M. Goodman,et al.  Microbial response over time to hydrologic and fertilization treatments in a simulated wet prairie , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[35]  E. Stanley,et al.  Rapid Nitrate Loss and Denitrification in a Temperate River Floodplain , 2005 .

[36]  A. Watts,et al.  The Myths of Restoration Ecology , 2005 .

[37]  K. Tockner,et al.  Hydrological connectivity, and the exchange of organic matter and nutrients in a dynamic river–floodplain system (Danube, Austria) , 1999 .

[38]  R. Brooks,et al.  Assessing the relationship between biomass and soil organic matter in created wetlands of central Pennsylvania, USA , 2001 .

[39]  C. Richardson,et al.  Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina , 2006, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[40]  G. Robertson,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF DENITRIFIER COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN A TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM , 2000 .

[41]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF HUMAN‐ALTERED FLOODS: LEVEES, FLOODS, AND FLOODPLAIN FORESTS ALONG THE WISCONSIN RIVER , 2002 .

[42]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.