Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days enhances motor performance of a grip task.

BACKGROUND Recovery of handgrip is critical after stroke since it is positively related to upper limb function. To boost motor recovery, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising, non-invasive brain stimulation technique for the rehabilitation of persons with stroke. When applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), tDCS has been shown to modulate neural processes involved in motor learning. However, no studies have looked at the impact of tDCS on the learning of a grip task in both stroke and healthy individuals. OBJECTIVE To assess the use of tDCS over multiple days to promote motor learning of a grip task using a learning paradigm involving a speed-accuracy tradeoff in healthy individuals. METHODS In a double-blinded experiment, 30 right-handed subjects (mean age: 22.1±3.3 years) participated in the study and were randomly assigned to an anodal (n=15) or sham (n=15) stimulation group. First, subjects performed the grip task with their dominant hand while following the pace of a metronome. Afterwards, subjects trained on the task, at their own pace, over 5 consecutive days while receiving sham or anodal tDCS over M1. After training, subjects performed de novo the metronome-assisted task. The change in performance between the pre and post metronome-assisted task was used to assess the impact of the grip task and tDCS on learning. RESULTS Anodal tDCS over M1 had a significant effect on the speed-accuracy tradeoff function. The anodal tDCS group showed significantly greater improvement in performance (39.28±15.92%) than the sham tDCS group (24.06±16.35%) on the metronome-assisted task, t(28)=2.583, P=0.015 (effect size d=0.94). CONCLUSIONS Anodal tDCS is effective in promoting grip motor learning in healthy individuals. Further studies are warranted to test its potential use for the rehabilitation of fine motor skills in stroke patients.

[1]  U. Halsband,et al.  Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. , 2004, Postgraduate medical journal.

[3]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroreport.

[5]  P. Sauseng,et al.  Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Visually Guided Learning of Grip Force Control , 2015, Biology.

[6]  P. Celnik,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  A. G. Witney,et al.  Task-specificity of unilateral anodal and dual-M1 tDCS effects on motor learning , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  P. Rossini,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances procedural consolidation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Task-Specific Effects of tDCS-Induced Cortical Excitability Changes on Cognitive and Motor Sequence Set Shifting Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning , 2011, Neuron.

[13]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Task-Specific Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  R L Hewer,et al.  Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Reding,et al.  Effect of Lesion Location on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[19]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  M. Pollack,et al.  Assessments in Australian stroke rehabilitation units: a systematic review of the post-stroke validity of the most frequently used , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[26]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  N. Takeuchi,et al.  Rehabilitation with Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Review with a Focus on Neural Plasticity , 2013, Stroke research and treatment.

[28]  N. Fox,et al.  Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox , 2013, Neurology.

[29]  T. Olsen,et al.  Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. , 1990, Stroke.

[30]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.