DIRECT EXOPLANET DETECTION WITH BINARY DIFFERENTIAL IMAGING

Binaries are typically excluded from direct imaging exoplanet surveys. However, the recent findings of Kepler and radial velocity programs show that planets can and do form in binary systems. Here, we suggest that visual binaries offer unique advantages for direct imaging. We show that Binary Differential Imaging (BDI), whereby two stars are imaged simultaneously at the same wavelength within the isoplanatic patch at high Strehl ratio, offers improved point spread function (PSF) subtraction that can result in increased sensitivity to planets close to each star. We demonstrate this by observing a young visual binary separated by 4\asec ~with MagAO/Clio-2 at 3.9 \microns, where the Strehl ratio is high, the isoplanatic patch is large, and giant planets are bright. Comparing BDI to angular differential imaging (ADI), we find that BDI's 5$\sigma$ contrast is \about 0.5 mags better than ADI's within \about 1\asec ~for the particular binary we observed. Because planets typically reside close to their host stars, BDI is a promising technique for discovering exoplanets in stellar systems that are often ignored. BDI is also 2-4$\times$ more efficient than ADI and classical reference PSF subtraction, since planets can be detected around both the target and PSF reference simultaneously. We are currently exploiting this technique in a new MagAO survey for giant planets in 140 young nearby visual binaries. BDI on a space-based telescope would not be limited by isoplanatism effects and would therefore be an even more powerful tool for imaging and discovering planets.

[1]  B. Macintosh,et al.  Angular Differential Imaging: A Powerful High-Contrast Imaging Technique , 2005, astro-ph/0512335.

[2]  S. Desidera,et al.  The frequency of planets in multiple systems , 2007, astro-ph/0703754.

[3]  G. Weigelt,et al.  Speckle holography measurements of the stars Zeta Cancri and ADS 3358. , 1978, Applied optics.

[4]  C. G. Tinney,et al.  Catalog of nearby exoplanets , 2006 .

[5]  Eric B. Bechter,et al.  FRIENDS OF HOT JUPITERS. II. NO CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN HOT-JUPITER SPIN–ORBIT MISALIGNMENT AND THE INCIDENCE OF DIRECTLY IMAGED STELLAR COMPANIONS , 2014, 1501.00013.

[6]  J. Stauffer,et al.  The Age of AB Doradus , 2005, astro-ph/0510665.

[7]  P. H. Hauschildt,et al.  Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458 , 2003 .

[8]  J. Christou,et al.  Isoplanicity measurements for calibration of speckle holography amplitudes , 1986 .

[9]  Laird M. Close,et al.  THE GEMINI/NICI PLANET-FINDING CAMPAIGN: THE FREQUENCY OF PLANETS AROUND YOUNG MOVING GROUP STARS , 2013, 1309.1462.

[10]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[11]  Andrew Cumming,et al.  The Keck Planet Search: Detectability and the Minimum Mass and Orbital Period Distribution of Extrasolar Planets , 2008, 0803.3357.

[12]  R. Soummer,et al.  DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPLANETS AND DISKS USING PROJECTIONS ON KARHUNEN–LOÈVE EIGENIMAGES , 2012, 1207.4197.

[13]  F. Fressin,et al.  KEPLER-14b: A MASSIVE HOT JUPITER TRANSITING AN F STAR IN A CLOSE VISUAL BINARY , 2011, 1106.5510.

[14]  Markus Janson,et al.  A novel L-band imaging search for giant planets in the Tucana and β Pictoris moving groups , 2007, 0706.0095.

[15]  L. Woltjer,et al.  Optical Telescopes of the Future , 1984 .

[16]  NICMOS Observations of the Pre-Main-Sequence Planetary Debris System HD 98800* , 1999, astro-ph/9905366.

[17]  Matthew Holman,et al.  Long-Term Stability of Planets in Binary Systems , 1996 .

[18]  Gordon A. H. Walker,et al.  Speckle Noise and the Detection of Faint Companions , 1999 .

[19]  M. Meyer,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON LONG-PERIOD PLANETS FROM AN L′- AND M-BAND SURVEY OF NEARBY SUN-LIKE STARS: OBSERVATIONS , 2010, 1003.5340.

[20]  David Lafreniere,et al.  BAYESIAN ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY NEW STAR CANDIDATES IN NEARBY YOUNG STELLAR KINEMATIC GROUPS , 2012, 1209.2077.

[21]  M. Chareton,et al.  CCD photometry and astrometry for visual double and multiple stars of the HIPPARCOS catalogue III. CCD photometry and differential astrometry for 253 southern ``intermediate'' systems , 2001 .

[22]  Julien H. Girard,et al.  CONFIRMATION OF THE PLANET AROUND HD 95086 BY DIRECT IMAGING , 2013, 1310.7483.

[23]  H. Jang-Condell.  ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF PLANET FORMATION IN CLOSE BINARIES , 2015, 1501.00617.

[24]  Bertrand Mennesson,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATIONS OF HIGH CONTRAST IMAGING SET BY SMALL SAMPLE STATISTICS , 2014, 1407.2247.

[25]  J. Angel,et al.  First On-Sky High-Contrast Imaging with an Apodizing Phase Plate* , 2007, astro-ph/0702324.

[26]  Adam Burrows,et al.  Beyond the T Dwarfs: Theoretical Spectra, Colors, and Detectability of the Coolest Brown Dwarfs , 2003, astro-ph/0304226.

[27]  John H. Debes,et al.  ON THE MORPHOLOGY AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE HR 4796A DEBRIS DISK , 2014, 1410.7753.

[28]  C. A. O. Torres,et al.  Search for associations containing young stars (SACY). I. Sample and searching method , 2006 .

[29]  John R. Stauffer,et al.  Spectroscopy of Very Low Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs in IC 2391: Lithium Depletion and Hα Emission , 2004 .

[30]  A. Boccaletti,et al.  A Giant Planet Imaged in the Disk of the Young Star β Pictoris , 2010, Science.

[31]  Glenn Schneider,et al.  Coronagraphy with HST/NICMOS: detectability is a sensitive issue , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[32]  Frans Snik,et al.  Performance characterization of a broadband vector Apodizing Phase Plate coronagraph. , 2014, Optics express.

[33]  Markus Janson,et al.  SPOTS: The Search for Planets Orbiting Two Stars , 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[34]  Russel J. White,et al.  A SURVEY OF STELLAR FAMILIES: MULTIPLICITY OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2009, 1007.0414.

[35]  M. Janson,et al.  HOW DO MOST PLANETS FORM?—CONSTRAINTS ON DISK INSTABILITY FROM DIRECT IMAGING , 2011, 1111.5617.

[36]  P. Young,et al.  A KINE-CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AB DOR MOVING GROUP “STREAM” , 2013, 1301.5036.

[37]  B. Macintosh,et al.  Direct Imaging of Multiple Planets Orbiting the Star HR 8799 , 2008, Science.

[38]  Tyson Hare,et al.  The Magellan Telescope Adaptive Secondary AO System: a visible and mid-IR AO facility , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[39]  Andrew H. Breuninger,et al.  Clio: a 3-5 micron AO planet-finding camera , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[40]  B. Macintosh,et al.  Images of a fourth planet orbiting HR 8799 , 2010, Nature.

[41]  Laird M. Close,et al.  THE GEMINI PLANET-FINDING CAMPAIGN: THE FREQUENCY OF GIANT PLANETS AROUND DEBRIS DISK STARS , 2013, 1307.0818.

[42]  S. P. Quanz,et al.  OPTIMIZED PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS ON CORONAGRAPHIC IMAGES OF THE FOMALHAUT SYSTEM , 2013, 1310.8577.

[43]  F. V. Leeuwen.  Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction , 2007, 0708.1752.

[44]  Laird M. Close,et al.  A UNIFORM ANALYSIS OF 118 STARS WITH HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING: LONG-PERIOD EXTRASOLAR GIANT PLANETS ARE RARE AROUND SUN-LIKE STARS , 2009, 0909.4531.

[45]  A. Boccaletti,et al.  Search for cool giant exoplanets around young and nearby stars - VLT/NaCo near-infrared phase-coronagraphic and differential imaging , 2014, 1404.3502.