Unfractionated and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Adjuncts to Thrombolysis in Aspirin-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials

Background— There is uncertainty about the role of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with aspirin and thrombolysis. Methods and Results— We performed a meta-analysis of the randomized trials to assess the effect of UFH and LMWH on reinfarction, death, stroke, and bleeding. Fourteen trials involving a total of 25 280 patients were included (1239 comparing intravenous UFH versus placebo or no heparin; 16 943 comparing LMWH versus placebo; and 7098 comparing LMWH versus intravenous UFH). Intravenous UFH during hospitalization did not reduce reinfarction (3.5% versus 3.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.99) or death (4.8% versus 4.6%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.78) and did not increase major bleeding (4.2% versus 3.4%; OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.18) but increased minor bleeding (19.6% versus 12.5%; OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.43). During hospitalization/at 7 days, LMWH compared with placebo reduced the risk of reinfarction by approximately one quarter (1.6% versus 2.2%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; number needed to treat [NNT]=167) and death by ≈10% (7.8% versus 8.7%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; NNT=111) but increased major bleeding (1.1% versus 0.4%; OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.83 to 3.99; number needed to harm [NNH]=143) and intracranial bleeding (0.3% versus 0.1%; OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 4.52; NNH=500). The reduction in death with LMWH remained evident at 30 days. LMWH compared with UFH during hospitalization/at 7 days reduced reinfarction by ≈45% (3.0% versus 5.2%; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.73; NNT=45), did not reduce death (4.8% versus 5.3%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13) or increase major bleeding (3.3% versus 2.5%; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.72), but increased minor bleeding (22.8% vs 19.4%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.43). The reduction in reinfarction remained evident at 30 days. Conclusions— In aspirin-treated patients with STEMI who are treated with thrombolysis, intravenous UFH has not been shown to prevent reinfarction or death. LMWH given for 4 to 8 days compared with placebo reduces reinfarction by approximately one quarter and death by ≈10% and when directly compared with UFH reduces reinfarction by almost one half. These data suggest that LMWH should be the preferred antithrombin in this setting.

[1]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[2]  A. Skene,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Antman,et al.  Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as antithrombin therapy in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Design and rationale for the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (E , 2005, American heart journal.

[4]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of reviparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, on mortality, reinfarction, and strokes in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with ST-segment elevation. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[7]  R. Diaz,et al.  Efficacy of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: one-year follow-up results of the Assessment of the Safety of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, American heart journal.

[8]  V. Chioncel,et al.  Accelerated streptokinase and enoxaparin in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (the ASENOX study). , 2004, Kardiologia polska.

[9]  M. Dorobanțu,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of a New Streptokinase Regimen with Enoxaparin in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[10]  H. White,et al.  The TETAMI Trial: The Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin and of Tirofiban versus Placebo in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Patients Not Thrombolyzed: Methods and Design , 2000, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[11]  H. White,et al.  Antithrombin Agents as Adjuncts to Thrombolytic Therapy , 1999, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[12]  J. Groce,et al.  Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin , 2004 .

[13]  R. Peters,et al.  Recurrent cardiac ischemic events early after discontinuation of short-term heparin treatment in acute coronary syndromes: results from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B and Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) studies. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  H. White,et al.  The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients ineligible for reperfusion (TETAMI): a randomized trial. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Patterns of use of heparins in ACS , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[16]  P. Armstrong,et al.  ST segment resolution in ASSENT 3: insights into the role of three different treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, European heart journal.

[17]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Combination With the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin in the Prehospital Setting: The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS Randomized Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Circulation.

[18]  C. Granger,et al.  Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin as an adjunct to rt-PA (alteplase) for improvement of coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction-the ASSENT Plus study. , 2003, European heart journal.

[19]  R. Welsh,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as adjunctive therapy to fibrinolysis in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  E. Antman,et al.  Use of low-molecular-weight heparins in the management of acute coronary artery syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2003, JAMA.

[21]  M. L. Simoons,et al.  Improved reperfusion and clinical outcome with enoxaparin as an adjunct to streptokinase thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: the AMI-SK study☆ , 2003 .

[22]  E. Falk,et al.  Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2003, European heart journal.

[23]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[24]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  C. Wilson,et al.  Randomized comparison of enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin following fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, European heart journal.

[26]  E. Topol,et al.  The role of low-molecular-weight heparin in cardiovascular diseases. , 2002, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[27]  M. Simoons,et al.  Improved reperfusion and clinical outcome with enoxaparin as an adjunct to streptokinase thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. The AMI-SK study. , 2002, European heart journal.

[28]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  Enoxaparin as Adjunctive Antithrombin Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results of the ENTIRE-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 23 Trial , 2002, Circulation.

[29]  E. Topol,et al.  Eptifibatide and low-dose tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: the integrilin and low-dose thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (INTRO AMI) trial. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[31]  G. Gustavsson,et al.  Influence on coagulation activity by subcutaneous LMW heparin as an adjuvant treatment to fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, Thrombosis research.

[32]  R. Califf,et al.  Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data , 2002, The Lancet.

[33]  R. Marinescu,et al.  Streptokinase and enoxaparin in the pre-hospital management of the ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, Romanian journal of internal medicine = Revue roumaine de medecine interne.

[34]  H. White,et al.  Thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the HERO-2 randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[35]  Assent investigators Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction , 2001, The Lancet.

[36]  K. Coyne,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Enoxaparin, a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, With Unfractionated Heparin Adjunctive to Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis and Aspirin: Second Trial of Heparin and Aspirin Reperfusion Therapy (HART II) , 2001, Circulation.

[37]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery disease: pathogenesis and acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[38]  L. Wallentin,et al.  The low‐molecular‐weight heparin dalteparin as adjuvant therapy in acute myocardial infarction: The ASSENT PLUS study , 2001, Clinical cardiology.

[39]  E. Antman,et al.  Combination reperfusion therapy with abciximab and reduced dose reteplase: results from TIMI 14. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 Investigators. , 2000, European heart journal.

[40]  W. Rogers,et al.  Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  V. Kakkar,et al.  Low molecular weight heparin for treatment of acute myocardial infarction (FAMI): Fragmin (dalteparin sodium) in acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Indian heart journal.

[42]  K. Coyne,et al.  Low—molecular—weight heparins in acute myocardial infarction: RationaLe and results of a pilot study , 2000, Clinical cardiology.

[43]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[44]  Trial of abciximab with and without low-dose reteplase for acute myocardial infarction. Strategies for Patency Enhancement in the Emergency Department (SPEED) Group. , 2000, Circulation.

[45]  E. Antman,et al.  Abciximab facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 14 trial. The TIMI 14 Investigators. , 1999, Circulation.

[46]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) as adjuvant treatment of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction--a pilot study: biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes (BIOMACS II). , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  J. C. Brito,et al.  Confirmation that heparin is an alternative means of promoting early reperfusion , 1998, Coronary artery disease.

[48]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Randomized trial of low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) in prevention of left ventricular thrombus formation and arterial embolism after acute anterior myocardial infarction: the Fragmin in Acute Myocardial Infarction (FRAMI) Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[50]  R. Collins,et al.  Aspirin, heparin, and fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  D. Nilsen,et al.  Systemic Thrombin Generation and Activity Resistant to Low Molecular Weight Heparin Administered Prior to Streptokinase in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[52]  S. Pocock,et al.  A comparison of aspirin and anticoagulation following thrombolysis for myocardial infarction (the AFTER study): a multicentre unblinded randomised clinical trial , 1996, BMJ.

[53]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Clinical effects of anticoagulant therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview of randomised trials , 1996, BMJ.

[54]  R. Kornowski,et al.  Reduction of reinfarction and angina with use of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy after streptokinase (and heparin) in acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[55]  Stanley,et al.  Overview of randomized trials of intravenous heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[56]  Shuvalova Ep,et al.  The biochemical aspects of the pathogenesis of viral hepatitides , 1996 .

[57]  V. Aires,et al.  [The role of low-molecular-weight heparin in unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction and post-elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty]. , 1995, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[58]  J. Wójcik,et al.  Thrombolysis with recombinant unglycosylated single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (saruplase) in acute myocardial infarction: influence of heparin on early patency rate (LIMITS study). Liquemin in Myocardial Infarction During Thrombolysis With Saruplase. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[60]  P. Agostoni,et al.  Influence of heparin on fibrinogen and D-dimer plasma levels in acute myocardial infarction treated with streptokinase. , 1994, European heart journal.

[61]  C. O'connor,et al.  A randomized trial of intravenous heparin in conjunction with anistreplase (anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex) in acute myocardial infarction: the Duke University Clinical Cardiology Study (DUCCS) 1. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[62]  David Hunt,et al.  ISIS-3 - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF STREPTOKINASE VS TISSUE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR VS ANISTREPLASE AND OF ASPIRIN PLUS HEPARIN VS ASPIRIN ALONE AMONG 41,299 CASES OF SUSPECTED ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION , 1992 .

[63]  ISIS-1 Collaborative Group ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41 299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction , 1992, The Lancet.

[64]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Effect of early intravenous heparin on coronary patency, infarct size, and bleeding complications after alteplase thrombolysis: results of a randomised double blind European Cooperative Study Group trial. , 1992, British heart journal.

[65]  V. Fuster,et al.  The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2). , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[66]  G. Hanique,et al.  Infusion of Heparin Conjunct To Streptokinase Accelerates Reperfusion of Acute Myocardial-infarction - Results of a Double-blind Randomized Study (osiris) , 1992 .

[67]  V. Fuster,et al.  The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[68]  C McRae,et al.  Myocardial infarction. , 2019, Australian family physician.

[69]  D. Tate,et al.  Effect of heparin on coronary arterial patency after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[70]  J. Hsia,et al.  A comparison between heparin and low-dose aspirin as adjunctive therapy with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. Heparin-Aspirin Reperfusion Trial (HART) Investigators. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. MEDICAL SCIENCE GISSI-2: A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12 490 patients with acute myocardial infarction , 1990, The Lancet.

[72]  K. Lee,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and early intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, Circulation.

[73]  R. Collins Randomized factorial trial of high-dose intravenous streptokinase, of oral aspirin and of intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction. ISIS (International Studies of Infarct Survival) pilot study. , 1987, European heart journal.

[74]  Isis Pilot Study Investigation Randomized factorial trial of high-dose intravenous streptokinase, of oral aspirin and of intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction , 1987 .

[75]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.