Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains.

Two laws of sympathetic magic were described by Frazer and Mauss at the beginning of this century to account for magical belief systems in traditional cultures. In this study, we show that these laws fit well with a variety of behaviors in American culture, in responses to disgusting, dangerous, or valued objects. The first law, contagion, holds that "once in contact, always in contact." That is, there can be a permanent transfer of properties from one object (usually animate) to another by brief contact. For example, in this study we show that drinks that have briefly contacted a sterilized, dead cockroach become undesirable, or that laundered shirts previously worn by a disliked person are less desirable than those previously worn by a liked or neutral person. The second law, similarity, holds that "the image equals the object," and that action taken on an object affects similar objects. In this study, we demonstrate this law by showing, for example, that people reject acceptable foods (e.g., fudge) shaped into a form that represents a disgusting object (dog feces), or that people are less accurate at throwing darts at pictures of the faces of people they like. With these and other measures, we found a great deal of evidence for the operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in all 50 of the subjects we studied. The laws of sympathetic magic correspond to the two basic laws of association (contiguity and similarity}. We discuss the parallel and report a disgust conditioning study to develop this parallel.

[1]  A. Fallon,et al.  A perspective on disgust. , 1987, Psychological review.

[2]  P. Rozin One-trial acquired likes and dislikes in humans: Disgust as a US, food predominance, and negative learning predominance , 1986 .

[3]  A. Fallon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Food: The Development of Contamination Sensitivity to "Disgusting" Substances. , 1985 .

[4]  P. Rozin,et al.  The Role of Pavlovian Conditioning in the Acquisition of Food Likes and Dislikes a , 1985, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Anna S. Meigs Food, Sex and Pollution: A New Guinea Religion , 1984 .

[6]  A. Fallon,et al.  Family Resemblance in Attitudes to Foods , 1984 .

[7]  The child's conception of food: the development of food rejections with special reference to disgust and contamination sensitivity. , 1984, Child development.

[8]  A. Öhman Part VI. Evaluating evaluative conditioning: Some comments on “cognitions, evaluations, and conditioning: Rules of sequence and rules of consequence” by Levey and Martin , 1983 .

[9]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[10]  A. Appadurai gastro‐politics in Hindu South Asia , 1981 .

[11]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[12]  Anna S. Meigs A Papuan Perspective on Pollution , 1978 .

[13]  David F. Lancy,et al.  Likeness and Likelihood in Everyday Thought: Magical Thinking in Judgments About Personality [and Comments and Reply] , 1977, Current Anthropology.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[15]  J. Rattner [PSYCHOLOGY OF SUPERSTITION]. , 1965, Zeitschrift fur Praventivmedizin. Revue de medecine preventive.

[16]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[17]  M. Nagy The representation of germs by children. , 1953, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[18]  S. Asch Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  A. Angyal,et al.  Disgust and related aversions. , 1941 .

[20]  H. C. Warren A History of the Association Psychology , 2007, Nature.

[21]  E. S. Hartland The Mystic Rose: a Study of Primitive Marriage , 1902, Nature.

[22]  J. Mill A System of Logic , 1843 .