Linear exchange model for the description of mass transfer limited bioavailability at the pore scale.

Reactive transport simulations are a common approach for the quantitative assessment of contaminant biodegradation in the subsurface. To use knowledge on microbial kinetics for the simulation of in situ biodegradation, the mass transfer processes controlling the bioavailability of the contaminants need to be described appropriately. A common approach to account for this problem is using a linear exchange model controlling the link between bulk and bioavailable concentration. Assuming that the subsequent degradation is controlled by the bioavailable concentration, only, these two steps can be combined to an analytical expression for the overall reaction rate know as the Best-Equation. In our work, we evaluate this approach for its ability to describe biodegradation kinetics limited by pore-scale mass transfer. Results from explicit numerical and analytical simulations of mass transport and reactive consumption at the pore scale are used to test the accuracy of results obtained using the Best-Equation. Our analysis shows that strictly spoken the Best-Equation is not valid. However, a good approximation can be achieved with errors of less than 6% in cases of moderate bioavailability and much lower errors in cases of either low or high bioavailability. These results support the description of mass transfer processes used in many reactive transport models. Furthermore, we present a method to obtain an accurate estimate of the unknown rate parameter controlling the diffusive mass transfer processes at the pore scale.

[1]  Brian D. Wood,et al.  Effective reaction at a fluid–solid interface: Applications to biotransformation in porous media , 2007 .

[2]  E. W. Thiele Relation between Catalytic Activity and Size of Particle , 1939 .

[3]  Hauke Harms,et al.  Principles of microbial PAH-degradation in soil. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[4]  Hauke Harms,et al.  Impact of bioavailability restrictions on microbially induced stable isotope fractionation. 1. Theoretical calculation. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Jacques Villermaux,et al.  Chemical engineering approach to dynamic modelling of linear chromatography: a flexible method for representing complex phenomena from simple concepts , 1987 .

[6]  Duijn van Cj,et al.  Rigorous upscaling of a reactive flow through a pore, under important Peclet's and Damkohler's numbers , 2005 .

[7]  M. Alexander,et al.  Aging, bioavailability, and overestimation of risk from environmental pollutants , 2000 .

[8]  Pierre Regnier,et al.  Modeling Microbially Induced Carbon Degradation in Redox-Stratified Subsurface Environments: Concepts and Open Questions , 2007 .

[9]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Temporal Moment‐Generating Equations: Modeling Transport and Mass Transfer in Heterogeneous Aquifers , 1995 .

[10]  D. Button Biochemical Basis for Whole-Cell Uptake Kinetics: Specific Affinity, Oligotrophic Capacity, and the Meaning of the Michaelis Constant , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  R. Summers,et al.  The influence of mass transfer on solute transport in column experiments with an aggregated soil , 1987 .

[12]  H. Harms,et al.  Factors affecting mass transfer limited biodegradation in saturated porous media. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[13]  Kevin C Jones,et al.  Defining bioavailability and bioaccessibility of contaminated soil and sediment is complicated. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Henning Prommer,et al.  Modelling the fate of oxidisable organic contaminants in groundwater. In C. T. Miller, M. B. Parlange, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (editors), , 2002 .

[15]  A. Zehnder,et al.  Mass transfer limitation of biotransformation: quantifying bioavailability , 1997 .

[16]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Influence of Microbial Growth on Hydraulic Properties of Pore Networks , 2002, Groundwater 2000.

[17]  H. Harms,et al.  Impact of bioavailability restrictions on microbially induced stable isotope fractionation. 2. Experimental evidence. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Richard G Luthy,et al.  Contaminant bioavailability in soil and sediment. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Dirk F. Young,et al.  Effects of Column Conditions on the First-Order Rate Modeling of Nonequilibrium Solute Breakthrough , 1995 .

[20]  B. J. McCoy,et al.  Criteria to assess when biodegradation is kinetically limited by intraparticle diffusion and sorption , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Analysis of macrodispersion through volume-averaging: Moment equations , 1992 .

[22]  Carl I. Steefel,et al.  Modeling complex multi-component reactive-transport systems: towards a simulation environment based on the concept of a Knowledge Base , 2002 .

[23]  J B BEST,et al.  The inference of intracellular enzymatic properties from kinetic data obtained on living cells. I. Some kinetic considerations regarding an enzyme enclosed by a diffusion barrier. , 1955, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[24]  C. Harvey,et al.  Reactive transport in porous media: a comparison of model prediction with laboratory visualization. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Vemuri Balakotaiah,et al.  Dispersion of chemical solutes in chromatographs and reactors , 1995, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  H. Harms,et al.  Influence of substrate diffusion on degradation of dibenzofuran and 3-chlorodibenzofuran by attached and suspended bacteria , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[27]  Carl I. Steefel,et al.  Scale dependence of mineral dissolution rates within single pores and fractures , 2008 .

[28]  Vivek Kapoor,et al.  Experimental study of bimolecular reaction kinetics in porous media. , 2000 .

[29]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Biomass evolution in porous media and its effects on permeability under starvation conditions. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Macrotransport of a biologically reacting solute through porous media , 1996 .

[31]  Pierre Regnier,et al.  Modeling the impact of microbial activity on redox dynamics in porous media , 2005 .

[32]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Upscaling of the advection–diffusion–reaction equation with Monod reaction , 2009 .

[33]  Iuliu Sorin Pop,et al.  Effective dispersion equations for reactive flows with dominant Péclet and Damkohler numbers , 2007 .

[34]  Kagan Tuncay,et al.  Scale dependence of reaction rates in porous media , 2006 .

[35]  Peter C. Lichtner,et al.  On the upscaling of reaction-transport processes in porous media with fast or finite kinetics , 2002 .

[36]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Multiple‐Rate Mass Transfer for Modeling Diffusion and Surface Reactions in Media with Pore‐Scale Heterogeneity , 1995 .