Spatially explicit assessment of local biomass availability for distributed biogas production via anaerobic co-digestion – Mediterranean case study

Renewable energies, especially energy from biomass, contribute to the sustainable development of the territory. Simultaneously, by using biomass to produce bioenergy, bioreproductive land is devoted to supply energy. As the bioreproductive land area on the European level is decreasing, bioenergy competes against other demands like the production of food, industrial resources or cultural goods and services, among others, thus the correct assessment of the available local potential is important for local and regional planning. Moreover, bioenergy system being a socio-ecological system requires integrated approaches for the evaluation of the factors, components and interactions of such a system, considering that agriculture presents one of the major drivers of the land use change and biodiversity loss. Therefore, this work was focused on the development of the approach for and on the assessment of biogas potentials to provide a support for decision-makers and bioenergy industry at a local scale. The approach exploits the spatial relations among territorial units (i.e., a contiguity analysis), and integrates time series of continuous and discrete data. It is based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) combined with GIS-based analysis, and permitted to develop a territorial information system in support for biogas planning, perform analysis of feedstock for biogas from different sources potential and produce plausible scenarios for identification of biogas suitable territorial clusters; the analysis of the tradeoffs between the use of different local sources of the feedstock for biogas production are discussed as well.

[1]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level , 2007 .

[2]  M. Vizzari,et al.  Spatial modelling of potential landscape quality , 2011 .

[3]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[4]  F. A. Batzias,et al.  Evaluating livestock manures for biogas production: a GIS based method , 2005 .

[5]  NURI AZBAR,et al.  A Review of Waste Management Options in Olive Oil Production , 2004 .

[6]  Caterina Tricase,et al.  State of the art and prospects of Italian biogas production from animal sewage: Technical-economic considerations , 2009 .

[7]  S. Ward,et al.  Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany , 2010 .

[8]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[9]  Francesco Gullí,et al.  Small distributed generation versus centralised supply: a social cost-benefit analysis in the residential and service sectors , 2006 .

[10]  Hong Jiang,et al.  Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Giorgio Guariso,et al.  A GIS-based approach to evaluate biomass potential from energy crops at regional scale , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Kirby Calvert,et al.  Geomatics and bioenergy feasibility assessments: Taking stock and looking forward , 2011 .

[13]  Mônica A. Haddad,et al.  A GIS methodology to identify potential corn stover collection locations , 2008 .

[14]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[15]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  A GIS-based decision support system for planning urban transportation policies , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Nuri Azbar,et al.  Enhancement of biogas production from olive mill effluent (OME) by co-digestion , 2008 .

[17]  C. Forster,et al.  Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure , 2002 .

[18]  Laurence Marie-Pierre Palmowski Making energy from grape marc using anaerobic digestion , 2004 .

[19]  Massimiliano Manfren,et al.  Paradigm shift in urban energy systems through distributed generation: Methods and models , 2011 .

[20]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[21]  Nicola Zaccarelli,et al.  Spatial multi-criteria assessment of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe , 2012 .

[22]  Giorgio Guariso,et al.  Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources , 2011 .

[23]  J. Janke,et al.  Multicriteria GIS modeling of wind and solar farms in Colorado , 2010 .

[24]  Jon Hill,et al.  Resource mapping and analysis of farm livestock manures—assessing the opportunities for biomass-to-energy schemes , 2000 .

[25]  Norman R. Scott,et al.  Siting analysis of farm-based centralized anaerobic digester systems for distributed generation using GIS , 2005 .

[26]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks , 2007 .

[27]  Sotirios Karellas,et al.  Development of an investment decision tool for biogas production from agricultural waste , 2010 .

[28]  Shu-lin Chen,et al.  Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Dairy Manure in a Two-Phase Digestion System , 2010, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[29]  Reza Iranpour,et al.  Anaerobic Codigestion of Municipal, Farm, and Industrial Organic Wastes: A Survey of Recent Literature , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[30]  Brett A. Bryan,et al.  An assessment of the economic and environmental potential of biomass production in an agricultural region , 2008 .

[31]  Hinrich Hartmann,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: influence of co-digestion with manure. , 2005, Water research.

[32]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case , 2007 .

[33]  Moktar Hamdi,et al.  Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes , 2005 .

[34]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[35]  P. Balsari,et al.  Evaluation of the biogas productivity potential of some Italian agro-industrial biomasses. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[36]  P Balsari,et al.  The methane yield of digestate: effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time, and plant feeding. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[37]  Alastair J Ward,et al.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[38]  D Bolzonella,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of waste activated sludge and OFMSW: the experiences of viareggio and treviso plants (Italy). , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.