Version 6 of the consensus yeast metabolic network refines biochemical coverage and improves model performance

Updates to maintain a state-of-the art reconstruction of the yeast metabolic network are essential to reflect our understanding of yeast metabolism and functional organization, to eliminate any inaccuracies identified in earlier iterations, to improve predictive accuracy and to continue to expand into novel subsystems to extend the comprehensiveness of the model. Here, we present version 6 of the consensus yeast metabolic network (Yeast 6) as an update to the community effort to computationally reconstruct the genome-scale metabolic network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c. Yeast 6 comprises 1458 metabolites participating in 1888 reactions, which are annotated with 900 yeast genes encoding the catalyzing enzymes. Compared with Yeast 5, Yeast 6 demonstrates improved sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for predicting gene essentiality in glucose-limited aerobic conditions when analyzed with flux balance analysis. Additionally, Yeast 6 improves the accuracy of predicting the likelihood that a mutation will cause auxotrophy. The network reconstruction is available as a Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) file enriched with Minimium Information Requested in the Annotation of Biochemical Models (MIRIAM)-compliant annotations. Small- and macromolecules in the network are referenced to authoritative databases such as Uniprot or ChEBI. Molecules and reactions are also annotated with appropriate publications that contain supporting evidence. Yeast 6 is freely available at http://yeast.sf.net/ as three separate SBML files: a model using the SBML level 3 Flux Balance Constraint package, a model compatible with the MATLAB® COBRA Toolbox for backward compatibility and a reconstruction containing only reactions for which there is experimental evidence (without the non-biological reactions necessary for simulating growth). Database URL: http://yeast.sf.net/

[1]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Connecting Extracellular Metabolomic Measurements to Intracellular Flux States in Yeast , 2022 .

[2]  M. Brock,et al.  The use of “overall accuracy” to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[4]  The UniProt Consortium,et al.  Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  N. Price,et al.  Probabilistic integrative modeling of genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks in Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[8]  Hugh D. Spence,et al.  Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  A A ANDREASEN,et al.  Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Ergosterol requirement for growth in a defined medium. , 1953, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[10]  Edith D. Wong,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  William P. Burns,et al.  Gap Detection for Genome-Scale Constraint-Based Models , 2012, Adv. Bioinformatics.

[12]  Christoph Steinbeck,et al.  The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..

[14]  U. Sauer,et al.  Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Genome research.

[15]  Stan Matwin,et al.  Machine Learning for the Detection of Oil Spills in Satellite Radar Images , 1998, Machine Learning.

[16]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  Improving the iMM904 S. cerevisiae metabolic model using essentiality and synthetic lethality data , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[18]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Integration of expression data in genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions , 2012, Front. Physio..

[19]  A A ANDREASEN,et al.  Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Unsaturated fatty acid requirement for growth in a defined medium. , 1954, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[20]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[21]  María Martín,et al.  Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  N. Price,et al.  Genome-Scale Consequences of Cofactor Balancing in Engineered Pentose Utilization Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  Pedro Mendes,et al.  Yeast 5 – an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[24]  Neil Swainston,et al.  Further developments towards a genome-scale metabolic model of yeast , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.