Comparative Advertising in the Global Marketplace: The Effects of Cultural Orientation on Communication

This research examined the efficacy of one type of communication strategy, comparative advertising, in communicating product superiority to consumers across different cultures. In individualist cultures such as the United States, comparative advertising that highlights the superiority of the target brand is seen as more effective. However, in collectivist cultures such as Thailand, comparative advertising that highlights the similarity between brands is more likely to be effective. In addition, comparative advertising was more believable for unfamiliar brands in individualist cultures whereas comparison for familiar brands was more believable in collectivist cultures.

[1]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. , 1994 .

[2]  Durairaj Maheswaran,et al.  Cultural Variations in Country of Origin Effects , 2000 .

[3]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Use of Comparative Advertising for Brand Positioning: Association versus Differentiation , 1991 .

[4]  J. Aaker,et al.  Additivity versus attenuation : the role of culture in the resolution of information incongruity , 1997 .

[5]  Dan I. Candea,et al.  Understanding and Managing Challenges to the Romanian Companies During Transition , 1998 .

[6]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[7]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective , 1994 .

[8]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment , 2000 .

[9]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[10]  Daniel Munich,et al.  When the Future is not what it used to be: Lessons from the Western European Experience to Forecasting Education and Training in Transition Economies , 1999 .

[11]  I. Zinovieva.  Why Do People Work if They Are Not Paid? An Example from Eastern Europe , 1998 .

[12]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[13]  S. Jain.  Positive versus negative comparative advertising , 1993 .

[14]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Associative Positioning Strategies through Comparative Advertising: Attribute versus Overall Similarity Approaches , 1987 .

[15]  Charles B. Weinberg,et al.  The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception and Attitude: Some Positive Findings , 1984 .

[16]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Shaping the Route to Attitude Change: Central versus Peripheral Processing through Comparative versus Noncomparative Advertising , 1989 .

[17]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism , 1998 .

[18]  J. Mcmillan.  What Can North Korea Learn from China's Market Reforms? , 1996 .

[19]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[20]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[21]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Empathy Versus Price: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures , 1998 .

[22]  David W. Stewart,et al.  The Effects of Comparative Advertising on Attention, Memory, and Purchase Intentions , 1990 .

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes , 2000 .