Advancing Transdisciplinary Action Research in Rural Pennsylvania

The current academic discourse around interdisciplinary scholarship and dissemination has major implications for plural design, a prominent area of academic engagement in landscape architecture. The engagement of citizens in dialogues on public policy indicates increasing consensus that plural design must be embedded in larger, interdisciplinary systems that will advance the work of creating public policy. This paper participates in an inquiry of Stokols’s Transdisciplinary Action Research (TDAR) (2006) methodology and its potential to extend current theoretical and methodological limits in plural design research. Aligning with others, the author argues the importance of a structuring framework for plural design research and queries the philosophical and ethical changes necessary to advance environmental and community-based knowledge into higher levels of interdisciplinary discourse. The first or “theory” section juxtaposes plural design in academia with Stokols (2006) and other interpretations of transdisciplinary research. The second section uses the TDAR model to frame plural design research in three Susquehanna River towns in Pennsylvania. The discussion and conclusion speculate on the methodology’s specific applicability to the case study research and the value of TDAR for university plural design practice in general.

[1]  Sherry R. Amstein “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[2]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[3]  Thierry Ramadier,et al.  Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies , 2004 .

[4]  Henry Lu,et al.  Inside the Service Learning Studio in Urban Design , 1999, Landscape Journal.

[5]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  LandSCAPES: A Typology of Approaches to Landscape Architecture , 2003, Landscape Journal.

[6]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[7]  M. Gorman,et al.  Invention, Design, and Discovery: A Transdisciplinary Quest , 1995 .

[8]  P. Rosenfield,et al.  The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[9]  F. Fischer Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[10]  R. B.,et al.  The United Nations , 1947, Nature.

[11]  J. Sayers Against Method , 2016 .

[12]  Daniel Stokols,et al.  Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research , 2006, American journal of community psychology.

[13]  Barbara Faga,et al.  Designing Public Consensus: The Civic Theater of Community Participation for Architects, Landscape Architects, Planners, and Urban Designers , 2006 .

[14]  A. Weale Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2003 .

[15]  M. Buchy,et al.  Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field by Nick and Chris Lunch , 2008 .

[16]  Retrofitting Postwar Suburbs: A Collaborative Design Process , 2008 .

[17]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[18]  Laura Lawson,et al.  Dialogue through Design: The East St. Louis Neighborhood Design Workshop and South End Neighborhood Plan , 2005, Landscape Journal.

[19]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  Alain Findeli Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion , 2001, Design Issues.

[21]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. , 2006 .

[22]  P. Burger Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2001 .

[23]  Robin Williams,et al.  Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme , 2004 .

[24]  Kenneth M. Reardon Enhancing the Capacity of Community-Based Organizations in East St. Louis , 1998 .

[25]  Randolph T. Hester,et al.  Community Design Primer , 1990 .

[26]  Kyle D. Brown,et al.  Social Consciousness in Landscape Architecture Education: Toward a Conceptual Framework , 2003, Landscape Journal.

[27]  P. Davidoff Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning , 1965 .

[28]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[29]  Henry Sanoff,et al.  Multiple Views of Participatory Design , 2008 .

[30]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[31]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Constructing regional development strategies a case study approach for integrated planning and synthesis , 2008 .

[32]  Mark Francis,et al.  A Case Study Method For Landscape Architecture , 2001, Landscape Journal.

[33]  Carole Després,et al.  Futures of Transdisciplinarity , 2004 .

[34]  A. W. Spirn Restoring Mill Creek: Landscape Literacy, Environmental Justice and City Planning and Design , 2005 .

[35]  Catherine Saldutti Rubin,et al.  Inquiry by Design. , 2001 .

[36]  Philip Balsiger,et al.  Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale , 2004 .