论文信息 - Introduction of Electronic Referral from Community Associated with More Timely Review by Secondary Services

Introduction of Electronic Referral from Community Associated with More Timely Review by Secondary Services

BACKGROUND Electronic referral (eReferral) from community into public secondary healthcare services was introduced to 30 referring general medical practices and 28 hospital based services in late 2007. OBJECTIVES To measure the extent of uptake of eReferral and its association with changes in referral processing. METHODS Analysis of transactional data from the eReferral message service and the patient information management system of the affected hospital; interview of clinical, operational and management stakeholders. RESULTS eReferral use rose steadily to 1000 transactions per month in 2008, thereafter showing moderate growth to 1200 per month in 2010. Rate of eReferral from the community in 2010 is estimated at 56% of total referrals to the hospital from general practice, and as 71% of referrals from those having done at least one referral electronically. Referral latency from letter date to hospital triage improves significantly from 2007 to 2009 (p<0.001), from a paper referral median of 8 days (inter-quartile range, IQR: 4-14) in 2007 to an eReferral median of 5 days (IQR: 2-9) and paper referral median of 6 days (IQR: 2-12) in 2009. Specialists upgrade the referrer-assigned eReferral priority in 19.2% of cases and downgrade it 18.6% of the time. Clinical users appreciate improvement of referral visibility (status and content access); however, both general practitioners and specialists point out system usability issues. DISCUSSION With eReferrals, a referral's status can be checked, and its content read, by any authorized user at any time. The period of eReferral uptake was associated with significant speed-up in referral processing without changes in staffing levels. The eReferral system provides a foundation for further innovation in the community-secondary interface, such as electronic decision support and shared care planning systems. CONCLUSIONS We observed substantial rapid voluntary uptake of eReferrals associated with faster, more reliable and more transparent referral processing.

[1] Dean F Sittig,et al. Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[2] D. D. de Berker,et al. Strengths and weaknesses of electronic referral: comparison of data content and clinical value of electronic and paper referrals in dermatology. , 2007, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[4] A. Strauss,et al. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[5] G. Mitchell,et al. Multidisciplinary care planning and teamwork in primary care , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6] J. McNiff,et al. Action Research: Principles and Practice, (2nd ed.) , 2002 .

[7] Andy Channelle. Working with Others , 2009 .

[8] Cathy Schoen,et al. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. , 2009, Health affairs.

[9] Rayenne Dekhinet,et al. Working with Others , 1995 .

[10] G. Crealey,et al. Email triage is an effective, efficient and safe way of managing new referrals to a neurologist , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.