Postsurgical rehabilitation for adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy who were treated surgically: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review

Introduction Surgical rates for low back pain (LBP) have been increasing in Europe, North America and Asia. Many patients treated surgically will require postsurgical rehabilitation. Little is known about the effectiveness of postsurgical rehabilitation interventions on health outcomes or about patients’ experiences with these interventions. Objectives To conduct a mixed studies systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies regarding: (1) the effectiveness and safety of postsurgical rehabilitation interventions for adults with LBP treated surgically and (2) the experiences of patients, healthcare providers, caregivers or others involved with the rehabilitation. Methods and analysis We will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Index to Chiropractic Literature, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and the Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Source for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from inception in any language. Studies using quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies will be included. We will also search reference lists of all eligible articles. Data extraction will include type of presurgical pathology, indication for surgery, surgical procedure, how the intervention was delivered and by whom, context and setting. We will conduct a quality assessment of each study and consider study quality in our evidence synthesis. We will use a sequential approach at the review level to synthesise and integrate data. First, we will synthesise the quantitative and qualitative studies independently, conducting a meta-analysis of the quantitative studies if appropriate and thematic synthesis of the qualitative studies. Then, we will integrate the quantitative and qualitative evidence by juxtaposing the findings in a matrix. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this knowledge synthesis. Findings will be disseminated through knowledge translation activities including: (1) presentations at national and international conferences and scientific meetings; (2) presentations to local and international stakeholders; (3) publications in peer-reviewed journals and (4) posts on organisational websites. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019134607.

[1]  A. Cieza,et al.  Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  Martin Underwood,et al.  What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention , 2018, The Lancet.

[3]  Annabel E. Masson,et al.  Patient journey following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS): protocol for a multicentre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (FuJourn) , 2018, BMJ Open.

[4]  Kate Flemming,et al.  Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Kate Flemming,et al.  Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  A. Booth,et al.  Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 1: introduction. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  Kate Flemming,et al.  Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  S. Hahn,et al.  Increased Volume of Lumbar Surgeries for Herniated Intervertebral Disc Disease and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Nationwide Cohort Study , 2017, Spine.

[9]  Linda Gibson-Young Health Promotion Strategies , 2017 .

[10]  C. Dale,et al.  Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies , 2017, Journal of clinical nursing.

[11]  A. Rushton,et al.  Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of rehabilitation following primary lumbar discectomy: a qualitative focus group study embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial , 2017, BMJ Open.

[12]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, Lancet.

[13]  M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Trends in hospital admissions and surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spine disease in England: a 15-year time-series study , 2015, BMJ Open.

[14]  Kristin R. Archer,et al.  Patients’ Experience and Expectations of Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions: A Qualitative Study , 2015 .

[15]  Zachary Munn,et al.  Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.

[16]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, The Lancet.

[17]  H. Yoshihara,et al.  National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[19]  E. Hurwitz,et al.  Development and Validation of Providers’ and Patients’ Measurement Instruments to Evaluate Adverse Events after Spinal Manipulation Therapy , 2014 .

[20]  S. Vohra,et al.  Serious adverse events associated with pediatric complementary and alternative medicine , 2014 .

[21]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Rehabilitation Following Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cochrane Review , 2014, Spine.

[22]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[23]  Henrica C W de Vet,et al.  Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[24]  A. Baker A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I: Development of a Reliable and Sensitive Measure of Disability in Low-Back Pain , 2014 .

[25]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[26]  Agnieszka Pedrycz,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH - ICF , 2013 .

[27]  Gail M. Williams,et al.  A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  National in-hospital morbidity and mortality trends after lumbar fusion surgery between 1998 and 2008. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[30]  A. Abbott,et al.  Patients' experience post-lumbar fusion regarding back problems, recovery and expectations in terms of the international classification of functioning, disability and health , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[31]  P. Côté,et al.  Whiplash Injury is More Than Neck Pain: A Population-Based Study of Pain Localization After Traffic Injury , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[32]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC) , 2010 .

[33]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[34]  P. Kim,et al.  Technical advancements and utilization of spine surgery--international disparities in trend-dynamics between Japan, Korea, and the USA. , 2010, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[35]  David Moher,et al.  An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  P. Pluye,et al.  A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[37]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[39]  恵子 紀国谷 国際生活機能分類(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF)にみた福祉・保健・医療の専門職協働における連携に関する貢献と課題 , 2007 .

[40]  James N Weinstein,et al.  United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.

[41]  R. Deyo,et al.  Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  J. Malley,et al.  Younger Adults' Understanding of Questions for a Service User Experience Survey. Funded/commissioned by: The Health and Social Care Information Centre , 2006 .

[43]  Keith R Abrams,et al.  Meta‐analysis of heterogeneously reported trials assessing change from baseline , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[44]  Pierre Côté,et al.  Incidence and Course of Low Back Pain Episodes in the General Population , 2005, Spine.

[45]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[46]  G. Waddell,et al.  Rehabilitation Following First-Time Lumbar Disc Surgery: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration , 2003, Spine.

[47]  Thomas Ewert,et al.  Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[48]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[49]  Julie M. Miller The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) , 2002 .

[50]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The Oswestry Disability Index. , 2000, Spine.

[51]  R. Johnsen,et al.  Early Aggressive Exercise for Postoperative Rehabilitation After Discectomy , 2000, Spine.

[52]  P. Côté,et al.  The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey: The Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Related Disability in Saskatchewan Adults , 1998, Spine.

[53]  P. Côté,et al.  The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey: The Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Related Disability in Saskatchewan Adults , 1998, Spine.

[54]  M. Peat,et al.  Community Based Rehabilitation , 1997 .

[55]  R. Mcnutt,et al.  Acute Severe Low Back Pain: A Population-based Study of Prevalence and Care-seeking , 1996, Spine.

[56]  N. Hadler,et al.  Care‐Seeking Among Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain , 1995, Spine.

[57]  R. Slavin Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[58]  Geoffrey R. Norman,et al.  Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials , 1993 .

[59]  K. Follett,et al.  Etiology and Evaluation of the Failed Back Surgery Syndrome , 1993 .

[60]  C. Manniche,et al.  Clinical Trial of Postoperative Dynamic Back Exercises After First Lumbar Discectomy , 1993, Spine.

[61]  J. Cutler,et al.  Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[62]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[63]  R Ashton,et al.  Pain Intensity Measurement in Chronic Low Back Pain , 1991, The Clinical journal of pain.

[64]  A. Peretz,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale for therapeutic evaluation of pain in rheumatic patients. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology.

[65]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[66]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[67]  A. Beck,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation , 1988 .

[68]  M. Roland,et al.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. , 1983, Spine.

[69]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[70]  E. Ohnhaus,et al.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale , 1975, PAIN.

[71]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[72]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.