Networks of knowledge: The distributed nature of medical innovation

Innovation in medicine is a complex process that unfolds unevenly in time and space. It is characterised by radical uncertainty and emerges from innovation systems that can hardly be comprehended within geographical, technological or institutional boundaries. These systems are instead highly distributed across countries, competences and organisations. This paper explores the nature, rate and direction of the growth and transformation of medical knowledge in two specific areas of research, interventional cardiology and glaucoma. We analyse two large datasets of bibliometric information extracted from ISI and adopt an empirical network approach to try to uncover the fine structure of the relevant micro-innovation systems and the mechanisms through which these evolve along trajectories of change shaped by the search for solutions to interdependent problems.

[1]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[2]  B Becker,et al.  The long-term effects of iridectomy for primary acute angle-closure glaucoma. , 1978, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Emergent innovation systems and the delivery of clinical services: The case of intra-ocular lenses , 2005 .

[4]  J. S. Katz,et al.  Bibliometric indicators for national systems of innovation , 1998 .

[5]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[6]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[7]  S. S. Blume.  Cochlear Implantation: Establishing Clinical Feasibility, 1957–1982 , 1995 .

[8]  S. Webb,et al.  Insight and industry: on the dynamics of technological change in medicine , 1992, Medical History.

[9]  P A CHANDLER,et al.  Narrow-angle glaucoma. , 1952, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[11]  H A Quigley,et al.  Childhood glaucoma: results with trabeculotomy and study of reversible cupping. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[12]  M. Newman.  1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[13]  Mark Harvey,et al.  Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation , 2003 .

[14]  A POSNER,et al.  Syndrome of unilateral recurrent attacks of glaucoma with cyclitic symptoms. , 1948, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  V. Fuchs,et al.  Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. , 2001, Health affairs.

[16]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[17]  Stuart S. Blume,et al.  Insight and Industry: On the dynamics of technological change in Medicine Cambridge , 1991 .

[18]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[19]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2001, Graph Drawing Software.

[20]  John P. Walsh,et al.  The Virtual College: Computer-Mediated Communication and Scientific Work , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[21]  P J Airaksinen,et al.  VISUAL FIELD AND RETINAL NERVE FIBRE LAYER IN EARLY GLAUCOMA AFTER OPTIC DISC HAEMORRHAGE , 1983, Acta ophthalmologica.

[22]  W. Green,et al.  Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  O. Barkan,et al.  Narrow-angle glaucoma; pupillary block and the narrow-angle mechanism. , 1953, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[25]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[26]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations , 2003, Scientometrics.

[27]  W. Green,et al.  Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  Davide Consoli,et al.  Progress in Medicine: the structure and evolution of know-how for the treatment of glaucoma , 2005 .

[29]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[30]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[31]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Horndal at Heathrow? Capacity creation through co-operation and system evolution , 2003 .

[32]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[33]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Technological systems and economic performance : the case of factory automation , 1995 .

[34]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis , 2003, ArXiv.

[35]  Jost B. Jonas,et al.  Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma , 1988, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[36]  Robert L. Jacobson,et al.  The "Virtual College.". , 1995 .

[37]  C. Freeman.  Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[38]  P J Airaksinen,et al.  The correlation of functional and structural measurements in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[39]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership: Diagnostic Devices: An Analysis of Comparative Advantages , 1999 .

[41]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Sources of Medical Technology: Universities and Industry , 1995 .

[42]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[43]  R. Solé.  Linked: The New Science of Networks.ByAlbert‐László Barabási.Cambridge (Massachusetts): Perseus Publishing.$26.00. vii + 280 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–7382–0667–9. 2002. , 2003 .

[44]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[45]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[46]  Cécile Delcourt,et al.  Visual impairment in Type 2 diabetic patients , 1995 .

[47]  Maximino Aldana-Gonzalez,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2003 .

[48]  B. Lundvall.  National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[49]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[50]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[51]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .