Recognizing Family, Genus, and Species of Anuran Using a Hierarchical Classification Approach

In bioacoustic recognition approaches, a “flat” classifier is usually trained to recognize several species of anuran, where the number of classes is equal to the number of species. Consequently, the complexity of the classification function increases proportionally to the amount of species. To avoid this issue we propose a “hierarchical” approach that decomposes the problem into three taxonomic levels: the family, the genus, and the species level. To accomplish this, we transform the original single-label problem into a multi-dimensional problem (multi-label and multi-class) considering the Linnaeus taxonomy. Then, we develop a top-down method using a set of classifiers organized as a hierarchical tree. Thus, it is possible to predict the same set of species as a flat classifier, and additionally obtain new information about the samples and their taxonomic relationship. This helps us to understand the problem better and achieve additional conclusions by the inspection of the confusion matrices at the three levels of classification. In addition, we carry out our experiments using a Cross-Validation performed by individuals. This form of CV avoids mixing syllables that belong to the same specimens in the testing and training sets, preventing an overestimate of the accuracy and generalizing the predictive capabilities of the system. We tested our system in a dataset with sixty individual frogs, from ten different species, eight genus, and four families, achieving a final Micro- and Average-accuracy equal to 86 % and 62 % respectively.

[1]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Larissa L. Bailey,et al.  Trends in Amphibian Occupancy in the United States , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  H. Jaafar,et al.  Automatic syllables segmentation for frog identification system , 2013, 2013 IEEE 9th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications.

[4]  Alex A. Freitas,et al.  A Tutorial on Hierarchical Classification with Applications in Bioinformatics. , 2007 .

[5]  V King,et al.  A study of the mechanism of water transfer across frog skin by a comparison of the permeability of the skin to deuterated and tritiated water , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Alex A. Freitas,et al.  A survey of hierarchical classification across different application domains , 2010, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[7]  M. Alexander,et al.  Climate change and amphibian declines: is there a link? , 2003 .

[8]  W. Chris Funk,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in population dynamics of Andean frogs: Effects of forest disturbance and evidence for declines , 2014 .

[9]  Johannes Fürnkranz,et al.  Round Robin Rule Learning , 2001, ICML.

[10]  Gonzalo Vaca-Castano,et al.  Using syllabic Mel cepstrum features and k-nearest neighbors to identify anurans and birds species , 2010, 2010 IEEE Workshop On Signal Processing Systems.

[11]  Chenn-Jung Huang,et al.  Frog classification using machine learning techniques , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  N. Han,et al.  Acoustic classification of Australian anurans based on hybrid spectral-entropy approach , 2011 .

[13]  Phoenix X. Huang Hierarchical Classification System with Reject Option for Live Fish Recognition , 2016, Fish4Knowledge.

[14]  Celso A. A. Kaestner,et al.  Hierarchical Classification of Bird Species Using Their Audio Recorded Songs , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  P. Tyack,et al.  Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  Bruno Gingras,et al.  A three-parameter model for classifying anurans into four genera based on advertisement calls. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Eduardo Freire Nakamura,et al.  Feature subset selection for automatically classifying anuran calls using sensor networks , 2012, The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[18]  Paul Roe,et al.  Acoustic classification of Australian anurans using syllable features , 2015, 2015 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP).

[19]  Ronald W. Schafer,et al.  Introduction to Digital Speech Processing , 2007, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[20]  Eduardo Freire Nakamura,et al.  Similarity clustering for data fusion in Wireless Sensor Networks using k-means , 2012, The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[21]  Concha Bielza,et al.  Mining multi-dimensional concept-drifting data streams using Bayesian network classifiers , 2016, Intell. Data Anal..

[22]  Fernando Rodrigues da Silva Evaluation of Survey Methods for Sampling Anuran Species Richness in the Neotropics , 2010 .

[23]  Eduardo Freire Nakamura,et al.  A Distributed Approach for Classifying Anuran Species Based on Their Calls , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[24]  Guy Lapalme,et al.  A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Eduardo Freire Nakamura,et al.  An incremental technique for real-time bioacoustic signal segmentation , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Paul Roe,et al.  Acoustic features for multi-level classification of Australian frogs , 2015, 2015 10th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS).

[27]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Effects of the Endpoint Adjudication Process on the Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial: The ADVANCE Trial , 2013, PloS one.