Optimization of dose distribution with multi-leaf collimator using field-in-field technique for parallel opposing tangential beams of breast cancers

3 Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) planning software helps in displaying the 3D dose distribution at different levels in the planned target volume (PTV). Physical or dynamic wedges are commonly applied to obtain homogeneous dose distribution in the PTV. Despite all these planning efforts, there are about 10% increased dose hot spots encountered in final plans. To overcome the effect of formation of hot spots, a manual forward planning method has been used. In this method, two more beams with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) of different weights are added in addition to medial and lateral wedged tangent beams. Fifteen patient treatment plans were taken up to check and compare the validity of using additional MLC fields to achieve better homogeneity in dose distributions. The resultant dose distributions with and without presence of MLC were compared objectively. The dose volume histogram (DVH) of each plan for the PTV was evaluated. The 3D dose distributions and homogeneity index (HI) values were compared. The 3D dose maximum values were reduced by 4% to 7%, and hot spots assumed point size. Optimizations of 3D-CRT plans with MLC fields improved the homogeneity and conformability of dose distribution in the PTV. This paper outlines a method of obtaining optimal 3D dose distribution within the PTV in the 3D-CRT planning of breast cases.

[1]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Field-in-field tangent technique improves radiation dose homogeneity in breast conservation , 2003 .

[2]  V Mehta,et al.  Forward-planning breast IMRT: early clinical experience , 2003 .

[3]  Stephanie Sullivan,et al.  A three-field breast treatment technique with precise geometric matching using multileaf collimator-equipped linear accelerators. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Radiation dose to conceptus resulting from tangential breast irradiation. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  G. Severi,et al.  Analysis of Irradiated Lung and Heart Volumes using Virtual Simulation in Postoperative Treatment of Stage I Breast Carcinoma , 2003, Tumori.

[6]  F. Vicini,et al.  Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J. Isola,et al.  Lumpectomy with or without postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer with favourable prognostic features: results of a randomized study , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  M Partridge,et al.  The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  B. Emami,et al.  Evaluation of a standard breast tangent technique: a dose-volume analysis of tangential irradiation using three-dimensional tools. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  L. Tabár,et al.  10-Year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  K. Zedeler,et al.  Postoperative Radiotherapy in High-Risk Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Who Receive Adjuvant Chemotherapy , 1997 .

[13]  N. Le,et al.  Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  B. Aron,et al.  Breast conservation radiation therapy technique for women with large breasts. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.