Universal Grammar, transfer and variability: a case study

This paper examines the English interlanguage of an adult Spanish advanced subject. It is tried to show here how his variable performance in spontaneous conversation and grammaticality judgements with respect to certain core grammar aspects may reflect a non native competence based both on his first language grammatical competence and new language rule construction capabilities. Supposedly native clustering parametrical properties appear to be learned separately, some of them requiring negative evidence to be fixed.

[1]  Lydia White,et al.  THE “PRO-DROP” PARAMETER IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1985 .

[2]  L. Rizzi.  Null objects in Italian and the theory of 'pro' , 1986 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky.  Some notes on economy of derivation and representation , 2013 .

[4]  J. Ouhalla.  Functional Categories and Parametric Variation , 1991 .

[5]  O. Jaeggli,et al.  The Null Subject Parameter , 1989 .

[6]  Rección y ligamento en español: aspectos del parámetro del sujeto nulo , 1989 .

[7]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[8]  O. Jaeggli.  Topics in Romance syntax , 1982 .

[9]  Helmut Zobl,et al.  Sources of Linguistic Knowledge and Uniformity of Nonnative Performance , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  Juana M. Liceras.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish , 1989 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky.  Language and Problems of Knowledge , 1987 .

[12]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages , 1984 .

[13]  Sascha W. Felix,et al.  UG-Generated Knowledge in Adult Second Language Acquisition , 1988 .

[14]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  English Grammar: A Generative Perspective , 1998 .

[15]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Elena de Miguel Aparicio.  Construcciones ergativas e inversión en la lengua y la interlengua española , 1993 .

[17]  Sharon Hilles,et al.  Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter , 1986 .

[18]  Christian Adjémian,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF INTERLANGUAGE SYSTEMS , 1976 .

[19]  René Coppieters.  Competence Differences between Native and Near-Native Speakers , 1987 .

[20]  Lydia White.  Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom , 1991 .

[21]  E. Lenneberg.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[23]  Esther Torrego Salcedo.  On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects , 1984 .

[24]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[25]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Language Learning , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Peter W. Culicover.  Evidence against ECP accounts of the 'that-t' effect , 1993 .

[27]  Marianne Phinney,et al.  The Pro-Drop Parameter in Second Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[28]  Lydia White,et al.  UG or not UG, that is the question: a reply to Clahsen and Muysken , 1987 .

[29]  Lydia White,et al.  The Verb-Movement Parameter in Second Language Acquisition , 1990 .

[30]  David M. Perlmutter.  Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax , 1973 .

[31]  Wayne O'Neil,et al.  Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition , 1988 .