A Non-Convex Approach To Joint Sensor Calibration And Spectrum Estimation

Blind sensor calibration for spectrum estimation is the problem of estimating the unknown sensor calibration parameters as well as the parameters-of-interest of the impinging signals simultaneously from snapshots of measurements obtained from an array of sensors. In this paper, we consider blind phase and gain calibration (BPGC) problem for direction-of-arrival estimation with multiple snapshots of measurements obtained from an uniform array of sensors, where each sensor is perturbed by an unknown gain and phase parameter. Due to the unknown sensor and signal parameters, BPGC problem is a highly nonlinear problem. Assuming that the sources are uncorrelated, the covariance matrix of the measurements in a perfectly calibrated array is a Toeplitz matrix. Leveraging this fact, we first change the nonlinear problem to a linear problem considering certain rank-one positive semidefinite matrix, and then suggest a non-convex optimization approach to find the factor of the rank-one matrix under a unit norm constraint to avoid trivial solutions. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our proposed non-convex optimization approach provides better or competitive recovery performance than existing methods in the literature, without requiring any tuning parameters.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sensor Calibration for Off-the-Grid Spectral Estimation , 2017, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis.

[2]  Pierre-Antoine Absil,et al.  Trust-Region Methods on Riemannian Manifolds , 2007, Found. Comput. Math..

[3]  Sumit Roy,et al.  Self-calibration of linear equi-spaced (LES) arrays , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[4]  Liming Wang,et al.  Blind Deconvolution From Multiple Sparse Inputs , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Bamdev Mishra,et al.  Manopt, a matlab toolbox for optimization on manifolds , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Convex Optimization Approaches for Blind Sensor Calibration Using Sparsity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  T. Engin Tuncer,et al.  Classical and Modern Direction-of-Arrival Estimation , 2009 .

[8]  Nicolas Boumal,et al.  Riemannian Trust Regions with Finite-Difference Hessian Approximations are Globally Convergent , 2015, GSI.

[9]  Yiqiang Yu,et al.  Introduction to Direction-Of-Arrival Estimation , 2010 .

[10]  Yuejie Chi,et al.  Off-the-Grid Line Spectrum Denoising and Estimation With Multiple Measurement Vectors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[12]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Convex Programming , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  B. Friedlander,et al.  Eigenstructure methods for direction finding with sensor gain and phase uncertainties , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[14]  Yuejie Chi,et al.  Guaranteed Blind Sparse Spikes Deconvolution via Lifting and Convex Optimization , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[15]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  Self-Calibration via Linear Least Squares , 2016, ArXiv.

[16]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[17]  Robert E. Mahony,et al.  Optimization Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds , 2007 .

[18]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Direction of arrival estimation by eigenstructure methods with unknown sensor gain and phase , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[19]  Y. Bresler,et al.  Blind gain and phase calibration for low-dimensional or sparse signal sensing via power iteration , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA).