Simulations of midlatitude frontal clouds by single-column and cloud--resolving models during the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement March 2000 cloud intensive operational period

[1] This study quantitatively evaluates the overall performance of nine single-column models (SCMs) and four cloud-resolving models (CRMs) in simulating a strong midlatitude frontal cloud system taken from the spring 2000 Cloud Intensive Observational Period at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains site. The evaluation data are an analysis product of constrained variational analysis of the ARM observations and the cloud data collected from the ARM ground active remote sensors (i.e., cloud radar, lidar, and laser ceilometers) and satellite retrievals. Both the selected SCMs and CRMs can typically capture the bulk characteristics of the frontal system and the frontal precipitation. However, there are significant differences in detailed structures of the frontal clouds. Both CRMs and SCMs overestimate high thin cirrus clouds before the main frontal passage. During the passage of a front with strong upward motion, CRMs underestimate middle and low clouds while SCMs overestimate clouds at the levels above 765 hPa. All CRMs and some SCMs also underestimated the middle clouds after the frontal passage. There are also large differences in the model simulations of cloud condensates owing to differences in parameterizations; however, the differences among intercompared models are smaller in the CRMs than the SCMs. In general, the CRM-simulated cloud water and ice are comparable with observations, while most SCMs underestimated cloud water. SCMs show huge biases varying from large overestimates to equally large underestimates of cloud ice. Many of these model biases could be traced to the lack of subgrid-scale dynamical structure in the applied forcing fields and the lack of organized mesoscale hydrometeor advections. Other potential reasons for these model errors are also discussed in the paper.

[1]  J. Hack,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1) , 1987 .

[2]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[3]  William D. Hall,et al.  Source code documentation for the Clark-Hall cloud-scale model code version g3ch01. Technical note , 1996 .

[4]  Influence of ice‐phase physics of hydrometeors on moist‐convection , 2003 .

[5]  S. Klein,et al.  The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations , 2004 .

[6]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations , 1998 .

[7]  S. Moorthi,et al.  Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert - A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models , 1992 .

[8]  David A. Randall,et al.  A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure , 1998 .

[9]  M. Tiedtke,et al.  Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models , 1993 .

[10]  D. Randall,et al.  Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities , 2003 .

[11]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[12]  David A. Randall,et al.  Single-Column Models and Cloud Ensemble Models as Links between Observations and Climate Models , 1996 .

[13]  K. Droegemeier,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: Model dynamics and verification , 2000 .

[14]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  Cloud-resolving modeling of cloud systems during Phase III of GATE. Part II: Effects of resolution and the third spatial dimension , 1998 .

[15]  M. Yao,et al.  Efficient Cumulus Parameterization for Long-Term Climate Studies: The GISS Scheme , 1993 .

[16]  A. Tompkins.  A Prognostic Parameterization for the Subgrid-Scale Variability of Water Vapor and Clouds in Large-Scale Models and Its Use to Diagnose Cloud Cover , 2002 .

[17]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  An Intercomparison of Cloud-Resolving Models with the ARM Summer 1997 IOP Data , 2001 .

[18]  M. Tiedtke.  A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .

[19]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  Simulations of a Cold Front by Cloud-Resolving, Limited-Area, and Large-Scale Models, and a Model Evaluation Using In Situ and Satellite Observations , 2000 .

[20]  L. Ruby Leung,et al.  Prediction of cloud droplet number in a general , 1997 .

[21]  Kuan Xu.  Partitioning Mass, Heat, and Moisture Budgets of Explicitly Simulated Cumulus Ensembles into Convective and Stratiform Components , 1995 .

[22]  J. Katzfey,et al.  Midlatitude Frontal Clouds: GCM-Scale Modeling Implications , 2000 .

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .

[24]  Richard H. Johnson,et al.  The Relationship of Surface Pressure Features to the Precipitation and Airflow Structure of an Intense Midlatitude Squall Line , 1988 .

[25]  E. Kessler.  On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations , 1969 .

[26]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[27]  S. Ghan,et al.  Application of cloud microphysics to NCAR community climate model , 1997 .

[28]  Christopher P. Weaver,et al.  Improved Techniques for Evaluating GCM Cloudiness Applied to the NCAR CCM3 , 2001 .

[29]  S. Bony,et al.  Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements , 2005 .

[30]  J. J. Katzfey,et al.  Modification of the Thermodynamic Structure of the Lower Troposphere by the Evaporation of Precipitation: A GEWEX Cloud System Study , 1997 .

[31]  Xiaoqing Wu,et al.  Long-Term Behavior of Cloud Systems in TOGA COARE and Their Interactions with Radiative and Surface Processes. Part III: Effects on the Energy Budget and SST. , 2001 .

[32]  Steven K. Krueger,et al.  Numerical simulation of tropical cumulus clouds and their interaction with the subcloud layer , 1988 .

[33]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  ARM Value-Added Cloud Products: Description and Status , 2003 .

[34]  D. Randall,et al.  A cumulus parameterization with multiple cloud base levels , 1998 .

[35]  A. Illingworth,et al.  Toward More Accurate Retrievals of Ice Water Content from Radar Measurements of Clouds , 2000 .

[36]  Audrey B. Wolf,et al.  Modeling springtime shallow frontal clouds with cloud-resolving and single-column models , 2005 .

[37]  J. Hack.  Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2) , 1994 .

[38]  Anthony D. Del Genio,et al.  A Prognostic Cloud Water Parameterization for Global Climate Models , 1996 .

[39]  Hilding Sundqvist,et al.  A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content , 1978 .

[40]  M. H. Zhang,et al.  Objective Analysis of ARM IOP Data: Method and Sensitivity , 1999 .

[41]  Audrey B. Wolf,et al.  Intercomparison and evaluation of cumulus parametrizations under summertime midlatitude continental conditions , 2001 .

[42]  Kuan-Man Xu,et al.  Evaluation of cloudiness parameterizations using a cumulus ensemble model , 1991 .

[43]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation Test Bed , 1994 .

[44]  J. Slingo.  The Development and Verification of A Cloud Prediction Scheme For the Ecmwf Model , 2007 .

[45]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change , 1997 .

[46]  Luca Bonaventura,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description , 2003 .

[47]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models , 1990 .

[48]  M. Yao,et al.  Cumulus Microphysics and Climate Sensitivity , 2005 .

[49]  K. Sassen,et al.  Investigation of relationships between Ka-band radar reflectivity and ice and liquid water contents , 1994 .

[50]  G. Zhang.  Convective quasi-equilibrium in midlatitude continental environment and its effect on convective parameterization , 2002 .

[51]  Greg Michael McFarquhar,et al.  The Sensitivity of Radiative Fluxes to Parameterized Cloud Microphysics , 2003 .

[52]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Use of cloud radar observations for model evaluation: A probabilistic approach , 2004 .

[53]  W. Rossow,et al.  ISCCP Cloud Data Products , 1991 .

[54]  K. Emanuel,et al.  The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models , 1993 .

[55]  J. Katzfey,et al.  A Scheme for Calculation of the Liquid Fraction in Mixed-Phase Stratiform Clouds in Large-Scale Models , 2000 .

[56]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[57]  David A. Randall,et al.  Alternative methods for specification of observed forcing in single-column models and cloud system models , 1999 .

[58]  A. Arakawa,et al.  Interaction of a Cumulus Cloud Ensemble with the Large-Scale Environment, Part I , 1974 .

[59]  D. Randall,et al.  Liquid and Ice Cloud Microphysics in the CSU General Circulation Model , 1996 .

[60]  Y. Sud,et al.  Microphysics of Clouds with the Relaxed Arakawa–Schubert Scheme (McRAS). Part I: Design and Evaluation with GATE Phase III Data , 1999 .

[61]  W. Collins,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .

[62]  James J. Hack,et al.  A comparison of single column model simulations of summertime midlatitude continental convection , 2000 .

[63]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Constrained Variational Analysis of Sounding Data Based on Column-Integrated Budgets of Mass, Heat, Moisture, and Momentum: Approach and Application to ARM Measurements. , 1997 .

[64]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model , 1996 .

[65]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Evaluating aerosol//cloud//radiation process parameterizations with single-column models and Second Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-2) cloudy column observations , 2003 .

[66]  Kuan-Man Xu,et al.  Impact of Interactive Radiative Transfer on the Macroscopic Behavior of Cumulus Ensembles. Part I: Radiation Parameterization and Sensitivity Tests , 1995 .

[67]  Gerald M. Stokes,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program , 2003 .

[68]  Edwin Kessler,et al.  On the continuity and distribution of water substance in atmospheric circulations , 1995 .

[69]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. XII: A Diagnostic Modeling Study of Precipitation Development in Narrow Cold-Frontal Rainbands , 1984 .

[70]  Francis W. Murray,et al.  Ice-Bearing Cumulus Cloud Evolution: Numerical Simulation and General Comparison Against Observations. , 1976 .

[71]  Y. Sud,et al.  Microphysics of Clouds with the Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert Scheme (McRAS). Part II: Implementation and Performance in GEOS II GCM , 1999 .

[72]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  Evaluation of midlatitude cloud properties in a weather and a climate model: Dependence on dynamic regime and spatial resolution , 2002 .

[73]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of a Tropical Squall–Line System , 1977 .

[74]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  An intercomparison of cloud‐resolving models with the atmospheric radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data , 2002 .

[75]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large‐scale models. I: Description and evaluation of the microphysical processes , 1997 .

[76]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Objective Determination of Cloud Heights and Radar Reflectivities Using a Combination of Active Remote Sensors at the ARM CART Sites , 2000 .