Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems

Purpose To evaluate the reproducibility of vessel density calculations using different binarization methods obtained via two commercially available swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) systems. Methods Healthy volunteers were imaged using two swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) devices, PLEXElite and Triton. SS-OCTA examinations were performed using a 3 × 3-mm volume scan pattern centered on the fovea. A total of six methods were used for binarization in ImageJ, two global thresholding and four local adaptive thresholding methods. Resultant vessel density values were compared between the instruments and binarization methods. Images for 60 eyes from 30 healthy subjects were assessed by two reviewers who were blinded to the scanning system used. Results Twenty-two eyes were excluded due to poor image quality (17 eyes from Triton, 4 eyes from PLEXElite, and 1 eye from both instruments, P = 0.003). A final 38 eyes from 23 subjects were eligible for analysis. Each binarization method and instrument led to different median values. The coefficients of variation for vessel density measurements ranged from 0.3% to 2.3% and 0.6% to 4.7% for the PLEXElite and Triton, respectively. Local adaptive thresholding methods revealed higher reproducibility than did global thresholding methods for both devices. Conclusions Macular scans with both SS-OCTA instruments showed good reproducibility for vessel density measurements. PLEXElite recorded fewer poor images and had higher reproducibility than did Triton. These findings will inform the selection of proper binarization methods for the clinical detection of vascular diseases affecting the central retina. Translational Relevance The reproducibility for macular vessel measurements with SS-OCTA instruments was good. PLEXElite recorded fewer poor images and had higher reproducibility than did Triton.

[1]  Yue Shi,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Superficial Macular Retinal Vessel Density Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography En Face Images , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.

[2]  Martin F. Kraus,et al.  Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography , 2012, Optics express.

[3]  Khan BahadarKhan,et al.  A Morphological Hessian Based Approach for Retinal Blood Vessels Segmentation and Denoising Using Region Based Otsu Thresholding , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  Dao-Yi Yu,et al.  Functional and morphological characteristics of the retinal and choroidal vasculature , 2014, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[6]  Martin F. Kraus,et al.  Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic disc perfusion in glaucoma. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[7]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Adaptive document image binarization , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  B. Kapralos,et al.  An introduction to digital image processing , 1990 .

[10]  R. Spaide,et al.  Retinal vascular layers imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. , 2015, JAMA ophthalmology.

[11]  Alberto Diniz-Filho,et al.  Peripapillary and Macular Vessel Density in Patients with Glaucoma and Single-Hemifield Visual Field Defect. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[12]  Narendra K. Puttaiah,et al.  Regional Comparisons of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vascular Density in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes , 2017, Journal of glaucoma.

[14]  Mark A. Christopher,et al.  Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density and Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[15]  N. Phansalkar,et al.  Adaptive local thresholding for detection of nuclei in diversity stained cytology images , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing.

[16]  Mark A. Christopher,et al.  The Association Between Macula and ONH Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) Vessel Densities in Glaucoma, Glaucoma Suspect, and Healthy Eyes , 2018, Journal of glaucoma.

[17]  David J. Wilson,et al.  Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of vascular abnormalities in the living human eye , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[19]  Rosa Dolz-Marco,et al.  Quantitative OCT Angiography of the Retinal Microvasculature and the Choriocapillaris in Myopic Eyes. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Progressive Macula Vessel Density Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Longitudinal Study. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Macular Vessel Density in Glaucomatous Eyes With Focal Lamina Cribrosa Defects , 2018, Journal of glaucoma.

[22]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Inter-eye Asymmetry of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Bilateral Glaucoma, Glaucoma Suspect, and Healthy Eyes. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  A. Ho,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Macular Vascular Density in Healthy Human Eyes Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  L. Kodjikian,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quantitative Assessment of Choriocapillaris Blood Flow in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  T. Wong,et al.  Choroidal vascularity index as a measure of vascular status of the choroid: Measurements in healthy eyes from a population-based study , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Sebastian Wolf,et al.  OCT-angiography: A qualitative and quantitative comparison of 4 OCT-A devices , 2017, PloS one.

[27]  R. Spaide.  Choriocapillaris Flow Features Follow a Power Law Distribution: Implications for Characterization and Mechanisms of Disease Progression. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  Alberto Diniz-Filho,et al.  Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[29]  N. Eter,et al.  OCT-Angiography reveals reduced vessel density in the deep retinal plexus of CADASIL patients , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Dao-Yi Yu,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells: Energetics, compartmentation, axonal transport, cytoskeletons and vulnerability , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[31]  Siva Balasubramanian,et al.  Choriocapillaris Imaging Using Multiple En Face Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Image Averaging , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.

[32]  Giovanni Staurenghi,et al.  Reproducibility of Vessel Density, Fractal Dimension, and Foveal Avascular Zone Using 7 Different Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Devices. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  Ruikang K. Wang,et al.  Optic Disc Perfusion in Primary Open Angle and Normal Tension Glaucoma Eyes Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Microangiography , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  A. Sommer,et al.  Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.