The idea of clustering students according to their online learning behavior has the potential of providing more adaptive scaffolding by the intelligent tutoring system itself or by a human teacher. With the aim of identifying groups of students who would benefit from the same intervention, in this paper, we study a set of 104 weekly behaviors observed for 26 students in a blended learning environment with AC-ware Tutor, an ontology-based intelligent tutoring system. Online learning behavior in AC-ware Tutor is described using 8 tracking variables: (i) the total number of content pages seen in the learning process; (ii) the total number of concepts seen in the learning process; (iii) the total content proficiency score gained online; (iv) the total time spent online; (v) the total number of student logins to AC-ware Tutor; (vi) the stereotype value after the initial test in AC-ware Tutor, (vii) the final stereotype value in the learning process, and (viii) the mean stereotype variability in the learning process. The previous measures are used in a four-step analysis process that includes the following elements: data preprocessing (Z-score normalization), dimensionality reduction (Principal component analysis), the clustering (K-means), and the analysis of a posttest performance on a content proficiency exam. By using the Euclidean distance in K-means clustering, we identified 4 distinct online learning behavior clusters, which we designate by the following names: Engaged Pre-knowers, Pre-knowers Non-finishers, Hard-workers, and Non-engagers. The posttest proficiency exam scores were compared among the aforementioned clusters using the Mann-Whitney U test.
[1]
Jason M. Harley,et al.
Clustering and Profiling Students According to their Interactions with an Intelligent Tutoring System Fostering Self-Regulated Learning
,
2013,
EDM 2013.
[2]
Castro Espinoza,et al.
Clustering Educational Data
,
2010
.
[3]
Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.
Instructional interventions that motivate classroom learning.
,
2016
.
[4]
Matthew D. Pistilli,et al.
Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success
,
2012,
LAK.
[5]
Tomislav Volaric,et al.
Knowledge Tracking Variables in Intelligent Tutoring Systems
,
2017,
CSEDU.
[6]
Rebecca Ferguson,et al.
Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs)
,
2015,
LAK.
[7]
Cristina Conati,et al.
Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Classification to Build User Models for Exploratory
,
2009,
EDM 2009.
[8]
Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.
Data-Driven Learner Profiling Based on Clustering Student Behaviors: Learning Consistency, Pace and Effort
,
2018,
ITS.
[9]
Chris Piech,et al.
Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses
,
2013,
LAK '13.