Subordinated Debt and Banking Regulation: An Overview

[1]  A. Walther,et al.  Rules versus Discretion in Bank Resolution , 2019, The Review of Financial Studies.

[2]  Emanuela Giacomini,et al.  Bail‐In Rules and the Pricing of Italian Bank Bonds , 2019, European Financial Management.

[3]  Raffaele Giuliana.  Impact of Bail-In on Banks' Bond Yields and Market Discipline , 2017 .

[4]  Edoardo D. Martino.  Subordinated Debt Under Bail-in Threat , 2017 .

[5]  G. Chauhan,et al.  Subordinate debt, deposit insurance and market oriented monitoring of banks , 2016 .

[6]  V. Acharya,et al.  The End of Market Discipline? Investor Expectations of Implicit Government Guarantees , 2016 .

[7]  Andrea Resti.  Bank subordinated debt: a source of capital for lenders or a source of concern for retail investors? , 2016 .

[8]  C. Hadjiemmanuil.  Bank Resolution Financing in the Banking Union , 2015 .

[9]  Steven Mark Miller,et al.  The relative contributions of equity and subordinated debt signals as predictors of bank distress during the financial crisis , 2015 .

[10]  Charles Goodhart,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of Bail-In as a Bank Recapitalisation Mechanism , 2014 .

[11]  Zhichao Zhang,et al.  Subordinated debt as instrument of market discipline: Risk sensitivity of sub-debt yield spreads in UK banking , 2014 .

[12]  Tu Nguyen.  The disciplinary effect of subordinated debt on bank risk taking , 2013 .

[13]  B. W. D. Mauro,et al.  Quantifying structural subsidy values for systemically important financial institutions , 2012 .

[14]  Michel Araten,et al.  Understanding the Funding Cost Differences between Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) and Non-G-SIBs in the United States , 2012 .

[15]  M. Belkhir.  Do Subordinated Debt Holders Discipline Bank Risk-Taking? Evidence from Risk Management Decisions , 2012 .

[16]  I. Hasan,et al.  Subordinated Debt, Market Discipline, and Bank Risk , 2011 .

[17]  C. Bates,et al.  Legal aspects of bank bail-ins , 2011 .

[18]  Douglas D. Evanoff,et al.  Enhancing market discipline in banking: The role of subordinated debt in financial regulatory reform , 2011 .

[19]  Jens Hagendorff,et al.  Distance to Default, Subordinated Debt, and Distress Indicators in the Banking Industry , 2010 .

[20]  H. Huizinga,et al.  Are Banks Too Big to Fail or Too Big to Save? International Evidence from Equity Pricesand CDS Spreads. Policy Research Working Paper 5360. , 2010 .

[21]  S. Ravid,et al.  The Notching Rule for Subordinated Debt and the Information Content of Debt Rating , 2010 .

[22]  M. Hall,et al.  Should a Mandatory Subordinated Debt Policy Be Introduced in the United Kingdom? Evidence from the Issuance Activity of Banks and Building Societies , 2010 .

[23]  H. Huizinga,et al.  Are Banks Too Big to Fail or Too Big to Save? International Evidence from Equity Prices and CDS Spreads , 2010 .

[24]  Gu-Shin Tung,et al.  Does Subordinated Debt Play a Role for Market Discipline? , 2010 .

[25]  D. Baker,et al.  The Value of the “Too Big to Fail” Big Bank Subsidy , 2009 .

[26]  G. González-Rivera,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of financial intermediaries with subordinated debt , 2006 .

[27]  Paul Hamalainen,et al.  Mandatory Subordinated Debt and the Corporate Governance of Banks , 2004 .

[28]  Douglas D. Evanoff,et al.  Reforming Bank Capital Regulation: Using Subordinated Debt to Enhance Market and Supervisory Discipline , 2001 .

[29]  Charles W. Calomiris.  Building an incentive-compatible safety net , 1999 .

[30]  R. Litan,et al.  American finance for the 21st century , 1998 .

[31]  Douglas D. Evanoff.  Preferred Sources of Market Discipline , 1993 .