Nanoparticles in facade coatings: a survey of industrial experts on functional and environmental benefits and challenges

Integrating engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) into facade coatings is expected to offer considerable potential for improved or novel functionality, or even several functionalities at the same time (multifunctional materials). Little information is available about the tangible use of ENPs in facade coatings and the real improvements that their functionalities provide. In order to increase this information, we carried out a survey among selected coating manufacturers and ENP producers in Europe. We asked them about the improved functionalities enabled by ENPs, the quality of nano-enhanced facade coatings in comparison to conventional ones, and the handling of waste. The survey results indicated that the ENPs most frequently used in facade coatings in Europe were silver, titanium dioxide, and silicon dioxide. The most frequently mentioned potential benefits were ultraviolet-protection, water and dirt repellency (easy to clean), and antimicrobial properties. Improving environmental performance through the use of nano-enhanced facade coatings did not appear to be a focus for innovation. The survey also revealed mixed results in the comparison between nano-enhanced and conventional facade coatings: 36 % of respondents saw a notable improvement, 27 % noted a gradual improvement of functionalities, and 37 % detected no improvement over traditional materials. Some respondents mentioned a variety of tests that can be applied to investigate the quality of coating functionalities. These tests could be valuable in helping us to better understand the tangible improvements of nano-enhanced facade coating functionalities. Respondents were uncertain about how to properly handle the wastes resulting from nano-enhanced products.

[1]  Donald R. Baer,et al.  Enhancing coating functionality using nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2003 .

[2]  Marc Saner,et al.  Commercial, Societal and Administrative Benefits from the Analysis and Clarification of Definitions: The Case of Nanomaterials , 2013 .

[3]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  Use of nanomaterials in the European construction industry and some occupational health aspects thereof , 2011 .

[4]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Release of TiO2 from paints containing pigment-TiO2 or nano-TiO2 by weathering. , 2013, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[5]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland. , 2015, Waste management.

[6]  Michael Burkhardt,et al.  Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[7]  Jian Sun,et al.  The change of the properties of acrylic-based polyurethane via addition of nano-silica , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Wick,et al.  Toward the development of decision supporting tools that can be used for safe production and use of nanomaterials. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[9]  R. Hischier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of façade coating systems containing manufactured nanomaterials , 2015, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[10]  Jing Wang,et al.  Modeling the flows of engineered nanomaterials during waste handling. , 2013, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[11]  Gibson Peter,et al.  Towards a review of the EC Recommendation for a definition of the term "nanomaterial"; Part 1: Compilation of information concerning the experience with the definition , 2014 .

[12]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[13]  D. Sarkar,et al.  Effect of TiO2-containing nano-coatings on the color protection of heat-treated jack pine , 2011 .

[14]  Regula Haag,et al.  Release and environmental impact of silver nanoparticles and conventional organic biocides from coated wooden façades. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[15]  Peter Wick,et al.  Is nanotechnology revolutionizing the paint and lacquer industry? A critical opinion. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  G. Malucelli,et al.  Photopolymerization of epoxy coatings containing silica nanoparticles , 2005 .

[17]  M Boller,et al.  Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[18]  M. Gaberšček,et al.  Photocatalytic activity of anatase-containing facade coatings , 2011 .

[19]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Risk assessment of nanomaterials and nanoproducts ? adaptation of traditional approaches , 2013 .

[20]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Behavior of TiO(2) released from Nano-TiO(2)-containing paint and comparison to pristine Nano-TiO(2). , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Marco Gaiani,et al.  Leaching of nanoparticles from experimental water-borne paints under laboratory test conditions , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[22]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Nanoparticles and the Environment , 2005 .

[23]  Peter Wick,et al.  Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings. , 2011, Environment international.