In a very different voice: unmasking moral hypocrisy.

Across 3 small studies, 80 female undergraduates were confronted with the dilemma of deciding whom-themselves or another research participant-to assign to a positive consequences task, leaving the other to do a dull, boring task. In Study 1, where morality was not mentioned, 16 of 20 assigned themselves to the positive consequences task, even though in retrospect only 1 said this was moral. In Studies 2 and 3, a moral strategy was suggested: either flipping a coin or accepting task assignment by the experimenter. In Study 2, 10 of 20 participants flipped a coin, but of these, 9 assigned themselves the positive consequences task. In Study 3, participants were significantly more likely to accept the experimenter's assignment when it gave them the positive consequences task. Overall, results suggested motivation to appear moral yet still benefit oneself. Such motivation is called moral hypocrisy.

[1]  Portland House.  Webster's Desk Dictionary of the English Language , 1990 .

[2]  Hannah Arendt,et al.  Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil , 1964 .

[3]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  WORDS, DEEDS, AND THE PERCEPTION OF CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ACTION SITUATIONS ' , 1968 .

[4]  Ervin Staub,et al.  The roots of evil : the origins of genocide and other group violence , 1990 .

[5]  J. B. Maller,et al.  Studies in the Nature of Character. , 1930 .

[6]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict , 1995 .

[7]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[8]  C. Batson,et al.  Critical self-reflection and self-perceived altruism: when self-reward fails. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[10]  W. Kurtines,et al.  The development of moral thought: review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  M. Weitz,et al.  Contemporary British Philosophy , 1958 .

[12]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[13]  Thomas Lickona,et al.  Moral development and behavior : theory, research, and social issues , 1976 .

[14]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[15]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  N. Noddings.  Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education , 1984 .

[17]  Derek Wright.  The Psychology of Moral Behaviour , 1971 .

[18]  D. Campbell.  On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. , 1976, Zygon.

[19]  R. Frank.  Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions , 1990 .

[20]  S. Freud.  Civilization and Its Discontents , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[21]  Carol Gilligan,et al.  Mapping the moral domain : a contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education , 1988 .

[22]  R. Enright,et al.  Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development , 1991 .

[23]  E. Aronson,et al.  Special fields and applications , 1985 .

[24]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[25]  Carol Barner-Barry,et al.  The Biology of Moral Systems Richard D. Alexander New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1987 , 1988, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[26]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[27]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[28]  Samuel P. Oliner,et al.  The altruistic personality : rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe , 1989 .

[29]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Altruism, socialization, and society , 1980 .

[30]  L. Blum.  Friendship, altruism, and morality , 1980 .

[31]  A. Blasi,et al.  Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature. , 1980 .

[32]  E. Staub.  Helping a Distressed Person: Social, Personality, and Stimulus Determinants , 1974 .

[33]  A. Bandura,et al.  Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency , 1996 .

[34]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying. , 1972 .

[35]  R. D. Alexander.  The biology of moral systems , 1989 .

[36]  Lawrence C. Becker,et al.  Encyclopedia of ethics , 1992 .

[37]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[38]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[39]  E. Diener.  Deindividuation: Causes and Consequences. , 1977 .

[40]  J. Kozol.  Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools , 1992 .

[41]  Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. , 1988 .

[42]  T. K. Abbott,et al.  Kant's Critique of practical reason and other works on the theory of ethics , 1871 .

[43]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A Normative Decision Making Model of Altruism , 1981 .

[44]  M. May,et al.  Studies in deceit , 1929 .

[45]  C. Lowery,et al.  Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the use of justice and care orientations. , 1986 .

[46]  B. Williams.  Moral Luck: Utilitarianism and moral self-indulgence , 1981 .

[47]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Personality and social behavior , 1985 .

[48]  L. Kohlberg.  The Psychology Of Moral Development , 1984 .

[49]  James R. Rest.  Development in Judging Moral Issues , 1979 .

[50]  R. Kleck,et al.  Avoidance of the handicapped: an attributional ambiguity analysis. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. , 1991 .

[52]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  THE TRADITIONAL SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PERSONALITY , 1968 .