Postverbal constituents in Turkish and the linear correspondence axiom
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kayne (1994) argues that specifier-head-complement is the universal order and that the traditional SOV languages are derived by the leftward movement of various constituents in a head-initial structure. The universality of this claim is called into question by the fact that postverbal quantifiers take scope over preverbal quantifiers in Turkish. This article shows that head-final structures derive the correct scope readings in scrambled clauses in a straightforward and consistent manner, whereas head-initial structures require more complicated and sometimes contradictory assumptions. This suggests that although some SOV languages may be derived as Kayne suggests, others, like Turkish, must truly be head-final
[1] Eser Emine Erguvanlı. The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar , 1984 .
[2] H. J. Bennis. Gaps and Dummies , 1987 .
[3] Mürvet Enç. The semantics of specificity , 1991 .
[4] Joseph E. Aoun. 'Wh'- elements in situ: syntax or lF? , 1993 .
[5] Richard S. Kayne. The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .
[6] Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .