Fractional labelmaps for computing accurate dose volume histograms

PURPOSE: In radiation therapy treatment planning systems, structures are represented as parallel 2D contours. For treatment planning algorithms, structures must be converted into labelmap (i.e. 3D image denoting structure inside/outside) representations. This is often done by triangulated a surface from contours, which is converted into a binary labelmap. This surface to binary labelmap conversion can cause large errors in small structures. Binary labelmaps are often represented using one byte per voxel, meaning a large amount of memory is unused. Our goal is to develop a fractional labelmap representation containing non-binary values, allowing more information to be stored in the same amount of memory. METHODS: We implemented an algorithm in 3D Slicer, which converts surfaces to fractional labelmaps by creating 216 binary labelmaps, changing the labelmap origin on each iteration. The binary labelmap values are summed to create the fractional labelmap. In addition, an algorithm is implemented in the SlicerRT toolkit that calculates dose volume histograms (DVH) using fractional labelmaps. RESULTS: We found that with manually segmented RANDO head and neck structures, fractional labelmaps represented structure volume up to 19.07% (average 6.81%) more accurately than binary labelmaps, while occupying the same amount of memory. When compared to baseline DVH from treatment planning software, DVH from fractional labelmaps had agreement acceptance percent (1% ΔD, 1% ΔV) up to 57.46% higher (average 4.33%) than DVH from binary labelmaps. CONCLUSION: Fractional labelmaps promise to be an effective method for structure representation, allowing considerably more information to be stored in the same amount of memory.

[1]  G. Starkschall,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Fractional Segmentation of White Matter , 1999, MICCAI.

[3]  James C. Gee,et al.  Partial Volume Segmentation of Cerebral MRI Scans with Mixture Model Clustering , 2001, IPMI.

[4]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Statistical Validation of Automated Probabilistic Segmentation against Composite Latent Expert Ground Truth in MR Imaging of Brain Tumors , 2002, MICCAI.

[5]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[7]  D. Joseph,et al.  Comparison of DVH data from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Andras Lasso,et al.  SlicerRT: radiation therapy research toolkit for 3D Slicer. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Linghong Zhou,et al.  Automatic treatment plan re-optimization for adaptive radiotherapy guided with the initial plan DVHs , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Reconstruction of surfaces from planar contours through contour interpolation , 2015, Medical Imaging.