Kathu Pan 1 points and the assemblage-scale, probabilistic approach: a response to Rots and Plisson, “Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact”

Abstract Rots and Plisson (2014) question our conclusion that 500,000-year-old points from Kathu Pan 1, South Africa were used as spear tips (Wilkins et al., 2012). However, their reinterpretation of the fractures we identify as diagnostic impact fractures are incorrect. Despite the assertion, knapping processes alone do not explain the basal modifications on the KP1 points. Although Rots and Plisson are critical of the edge damage distribution method, it provides objective, quantitative and statistical comparisons of experimental and archaeological datasets. The data we present stand as reliable evidence for early hafted hunting technology. We suggest that the disagreement stems from a differing perspective on how lithic functional studies should deal with equifinality and the challenge of confidently assessing stone tool function.

[1]  Nathan E. Stevens,et al.  Practical quantitative lithic use-wear analysis using multiple classifiers , 2010 .

[2]  W. K. Hutchings.  Measuring use-related fracture velocity in lithic armatures to identify spears, javelins, darts, and arrows , 2011 .

[3]  J. Shea.  Lithic microwear analysis in archeology , 2005 .

[4]  Claudiu L Giusca,et al.  New method development in prehistoric stone tool research: evaluating use duration and data analysis protocols. , 2014, Micron.

[5]  Zachary J. Davis,et al.  Experimental Tests of Middle Palaeolithic Spear Points Using a Calibrated Crossbow , 2001 .

[6]  P. Vermeersch,et al.  A Wasted Effort at the Quarry. Analysis and Interpretation of an MSA lanceolate point from Taramsa-8, Egypt , 2008 .

[7]  Adrian A. Evans,et al.  Laser scanning confocal microscopy: a potential technique for the study of lithic microwear , 2008 .

[8]  John J. Shea,et al.  The African Origin of Complex Projectile Technology: An Analysis Using Tip Cross-Sectional Area and Perimeter , 2011, International journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  T. Lazuén.  Please do not shoot the pianist. Criteria for recognizing ancient lithic weapon use , 2014 .

[10]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Blind tests shed light on possibilities and limitations for identifying stone tool prehension and hafting , 2006 .

[11]  C. A. Bergman,et al.  Hunters at Hengistbury: Some evidence from experimental archaeology , 1982 .

[12]  M. Lombard.  Distribution Patterns of Organic Residues on Middle Stone Age Points from Sibudu Cave, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa , 2004 .

[13]  Adrian A. Evans,et al.  On the importance of blind testing in archaeological science: the example from lithic functional studies , 2014 .

[14]  J. Shea,et al.  The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe , 2006 .

[15]  P. Villa,et al.  The Howiesons Poort and MSA III at Klasies River main site, Cave 1A , 2010 .

[16]  G. Odell,et al.  Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis , 1974 .

[17]  C. Marean,et al.  Edge damage distribution at the assemblage level on Middle Stone Age lithics: an image-based GIS approach , 2007 .

[18]  Benjamin J. Schoville.  Frequency and distribution of edge damage on Middle Stone Age lithic points, Pinnacle Point 13B, South Africa. , 2010, Journal of human evolution.

[19]  P. Villa,et al.  Stone tools for the hunt: points with impact scars from a Middle Paleolithic site in southern Italy , 2009 .

[20]  A A Evans,et al.  Using metrology in early prehistoric stone tool research: further work and a brief instrument comparison. , 2011, Scanning.

[21]  M. Chazan,et al.  Evidence for Early Hafted Hunting Technology , 2012, Science.

[22]  M. Lombard.  Evidence of hunting and hafting during the Middle Stone Age at Sibidu Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a multianalytical approach. , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[23]  Radu Iovita.  Shape Variation in Aterian Tanged Tools and the Origins of Projectile Technology: A Morphometric Perspective on Stone Tool Function , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Justin Pargeter,et al.  Rock type variability and impact fracture formation: working towards a more robust macrofracture method , 2013 .

[25]  R. Donahue,et al.  Lithic Microwear Analysis of Middle Stone Age Artifacts from White Paintings Rock Shelter, Botswana , 2002 .

[26]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact , 2014 .

[27]  Benjamin J. Schoville.  Testing a taphonomic predictive model of edge damage formation with Middle Stone Age points from Pinnacle Point Cave 13B and Die Kelders Cave 1, South Africa , 2014 .

[28]  Zachary J. Davis,et al.  Controlled Experiments with Middle Paleolithic Spear Points: Levallois Points , 2002 .

[29]  P. Villa,et al.  The Still Bay points of Blombos Cave (South Africa) , 2009 .

[30]  Justin Pargeter,et al.  Assessing the macrofracture method for identifying Stone Age hunting weaponry , 2011 .

[31]  K. Kuman.  Florisbad and not equal to Gi: The contribution of open-air sites to study of the Middle Stone Age in southern Africa , 1989 .

[32]  George H. Odell,et al.  Verifying the Reliability of Lithic Use-Wear Assessments by ‘Blind Tests’: the Low-Power Approach , 1980 .

[33]  P. Villa,et al.  A late Middle Stone Age artifact assemblage from Sibudu (KwaZulu-Natal): comparisons with the European Middle Paleolithic , 2005 .

[34]  Talía Lazuén,et al.  European Neanderthal stone hunting weapons reveal complex behaviour long before the appearance of modern humans , 2012 .

[35]  Anders Fischer,et al.  Macro and Micro Wear Traces on Lithic Projectile Points: Experimental Results and Prehistoric Examples , 1984 .

[36]  P. Vermeersch,et al.  Aspects of tool production, use, and hafting in Palaeolithic assemblages from Northeast Africa. , 2011, Journal of human evolution.

[37]  John E. Dockall.  Wear Traces and Projectile Impact: A Review of the Experimental and Archaeological Evidence , 1997 .

[38]  J. Shea,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Trampling on the Results of Lithic Microwear Analysis , 1993 .

[39]  Danielle A. Macdonald,et al.  The application of focus variation microscopy for lithic use-wear quantification , 2014 .

[40]  C. Russell Stafford,et al.  The Functional Hypothesis: A Formal Approach to Use-Wear Experiments and Settlement-Subsistence , 1983, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[41]  Paola Villa,et al.  Hunting weapons of the Middle Stone Age and the Middle Palaeolithic: spear points from Sibudu, Rose Cottage and Bouheben , 2006 .

[42]  A. Maier,et al.  Bois Laiterie revisited: Functional, morphological and technological analysis of a Late Glacial hunting camp in north-western Europe , 2011 .

[43]  Sam C. Lin,et al.  An experimental assessment of the influences on edge damage to lithic artifacts: A consideration of edge angle, substrate grain size, raw material properties, and exposed face , 2014 .

[44]  Kyle S. Brown,et al.  Comparing Lithic Assemblage Edge Damage Distributions: Examples from the Late Pleistocene and Preliminary Experimental Results , 2010 .