The diversity of H3 loops determines the antigen‐binding tendencies of antibody CDR loops

Of the complementarity‐determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies, H3 loops, with varying amino acid sequences and loop lengths, adopt particularly diverse loop conformations. The diversity of H3 conformations produces an array of antigen recognition patterns involving all the CDRs, in which the residue positions actually in contact with the antigen vary considerably. Therefore, for a deeper understanding of antigen recognition, it is necessary to relate the sequence and structural properties of each residue position in each CDR loop to its ability to bind antigens. In this study, we proposed a new method for characterizing the structural features of the CDR loops and obtained the antigen‐binding ability of each residue position in each CDR loop. This analysis led to a simple set of rules for identifying probable antigen‐binding residues. We also found that the diversity of H3 loop lengths and conformations affects the antigen‐binding tendencies of all the CDR loops.

[1]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  V. Giudicelli,et al.  IMGT unique numbering for immunoglobulin and T cell receptor variable domains and Ig superfamily V-like domains. , 2003, Developmental and comparative immunology.

[3]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  H3‐rules: identification of CDR‐H3 structures in antibodies , 1999, FEBS letters.

[4]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 revisited: A lesson in antibody modeling , 2008, Proteins.

[5]  A. Konagurthu,et al.  MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm , 2006, Proteins.

[6]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  T. T. Wu,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE SEQUENCES OF THE VARIABLE REGIONS OF BENCE JONES PROTEINS AND MYELOMA LIGHT CHAINS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTIBODY COMPLEMENTARITY , 1970, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  E. Kabat,et al.  Sequences of proteins of immunological interest , 1991 .

[9]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Conformation of beta-hairpins in protein structures. A systematic classification with applications to modelling by homology, electron density fitting and protein engineering. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Chantal Abergel,et al.  Identification of specificity‐determining residues in antibodies , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[11]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..

[12]  Yanay Ofran,et al.  A Systematic Comparison of Free and Bound Antibodies Reveals Binding-Related Conformational Changes , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  Michael L. Creech,et al.  Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[14]  Yanay Ofran,et al.  Structural Consensus among Antibodies Defines the Antigen Binding Site , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  eF-site and PDBjViewer: database and viewer for protein functional sites , 2004, Bioinform..

[16]  A. Lesk,et al.  Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions , 1989, Nature.

[17]  Paolo Marcatili,et al.  Prediction of site-specific interactions in antibody-antigen complexes: the proABC method and server , 2013, Bioinform..

[18]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  A Tramontano,et al.  Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[21]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Jiye Shi,et al.  SAbDab: the structural antibody database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Y. Ofran,et al.  The indistinguishability of epitopes from protein surface is explained by the distinct binding preferences of each of the six antigen-binding loops. , 2013, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[24]  Nadezhda T. Doncheva,et al.  Analyzing and visualizing residue networks of protein structures. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[25]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 in antibodies , 1996, FEBS letters.

[26]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Yanay Ofran,et al.  Paratome: an online tool for systematic identification of antigen-binding regions in antibodies based on sequence or structure , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..