Bit error distribution and mutation patterns of corrupted packets in low-power wireless networks

It is well known that wireless channels produce higher bit error rates than wired connections. However, little knowledge exists about how bit errors are distributed within messages. In this paper, we present results from our experiments in an 802.15.4 sensor node testbed investigating the distribution of errors within erroneous frames. We identify three effects that can only partially be explained by coding and channel conditions: (1) errors are not independently distributed, but to a certain extent bursty, (2) coding leads to some bits being more stable than others, and (3) some content is inherently more stable than other during transmission. We discuss hypotheses on the origins of these effects and give some preliminary ideas on how to leverage them.

[1]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  JamLab: Augmenting sensornet testbeds with realistic and controlled interference generation , 2011, Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[2]  David E. Culler,et al.  Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[3]  Robert Szewczyk,et al.  System architecture directions for networked sensors , 2000, ASPLOS IX.

[4]  James Brown,et al.  The Impact of Temperature on Outdoor Industrial Sensornet Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[5]  Seungjoon Lee,et al.  All Bits Are Not Equal - A Study of IEEE 802.11 Communication Bit Errors , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[6]  Thiemo Voigt,et al.  SoNIC: Classifying interference in 802.15.4 sensor networks , 2013, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[7]  Amy L. Murphy,et al.  Not all wireless sensor networks are created equal: A comparative study on tunnels , 2010, TOSN.

[8]  Andreas Terzis,et al.  Surviving wi-fi interference in low power ZigBee networks , 2010, SenSys '10.

[9]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Measurements of a wireless link in an industrial environment using an IEEE 802.11-compliant physical layer , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[10]  Dirk Pesch,et al.  Towards Energy Efficient Adaptive Error Control in Indoor WSN: A Fuzzy Logic Based Approach , 2011, 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[11]  Philip Levis,et al.  An empirical study of low-power wireless , 2010, TOSN.

[12]  TavakoliArsalan,et al.  An empirical study of low-power wireless , 2010 .

[13]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  An analysis of unreliability and asymmetry in low-power wireless links , 2007, TOSN.