Effectiveness of clopidogrel dose escalation to normalize active metabolite exposure and antiplatelet effects in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers

Carriers of two copies of the loss‐of‐function CYP2C19*2 variant convert less clopidogrel into its active metabolite, resulting in diminished antiplatelet responses and higher cardiovascular event rates. To evaluate whether increasing the daily clopidogrel dose in poor metabolizers (PM) overcomes the effect of the CYP2C19 * 2 variant, we enrolled 18 healthy participants in a genotype‐stratified, multi‐dose, three‐period, fixed‐sequence crossover study. Six participants with the *1/*1 extensive (EM), *1/*2 intermediate (IM), and *2/*2 poor metabolizer genotypes each received 75 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg each for 8 days. In each period, maximal platelet aggregation 4 hours post‐dose (MPA4) and active metabolite area under the curve (AUC) differed among genotype groups (P < .05 for all). At day 8, PMs needed 300 mg daily and IMs needed 150 mg daily to attain a similar MPA4 as EMs on the 75 mg dose (32.6%, 33.2%, 31.3%, respectively). Similarly, PMs needed 300 mg daily to achieve active metabolite concentrations that were similar to EMs on 75 mg (AUC 37.7 and 33.5 ng h/mL, respectively). These results suggest that quadrupling the usual clopidogrel dose might be necessary to overcome the effect of poor CYP2C19 metabolism.

[1]  E. Martínez-Quintana,et al.  Positive clinical response to clopidogrel is independent of paraoxonase 1 Q192R and CYP2C19 genetic variants , 2014, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[2]  J. O’Connell,et al.  The CYP2C19*17 variant is not independently associated with clopidogrel response , 2013, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[3]  J. Mega,et al.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2013 Update , 2013, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[4]  J. O’Connell,et al.  The functional G143E variant of carboxylesterase 1 is associated with increased clopidogrel active metabolite levels and greater clopidogrel response , 2013, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[5]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. Prabhakaran,et al.  Platelet function during extended prasugrel and clopidogrel therapy for patients with ACS treated without revascularization: the TRILOGY ACS platelet function substudy. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  S. Werns Standard- vs High-Dose Clopidogrel Based on Platelet Function Testing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The GRAVITAS Randomized Trial , 2012 .

[8]  R. Horenstein,et al.  A sensitive and rapid ultra HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of clopidogrel and its derivatized active thiol metabolite in human plasma. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[9]  M. Pencina,et al.  Dosing clopidogrel based on CYP2C19 genotype and the effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stable cardiovascular disease. , 2011, JAMA.

[10]  E. Liu,et al.  Dissecting the Activation of Thienopyridines by Cytochromes P450 Using a Pharmacodynamic Assay In Vitro , 2011, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[11]  Betti Giusti,et al.  High residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading and long-term cardiovascular events among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. , 2011, JAMA.

[12]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Genetic Polymorphisms and the Impact of a Higher Clopidogrel Dose Regimen on Active Metabolite Exposure and Antiplatelet Response in Healthy Subjects , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[13]  Hani Jneid,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in c , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Hani Jneid,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2007 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  I. Xanthopoulou,et al.  Prasugrel overcomes high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity post-stenting more effectively than high-dose (150-mg) clopidogrel: the importance of CYP2C19*2 genotyping. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  C. Hirschhäuser,et al.  Paraoxonase-1 is a major determinant of clopidogrel efficacy , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[17]  L. Bonello,et al.  Impact of loading dose adjustment on platelet reactivity in homozygotes of the 2C19 2* loss of function polymorphism. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[18]  E. Antman,et al.  Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[19]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Pilot study of the antiplatelet effect of increased clopidogrel maintenance dosing and its relationship to CYP2C19 genotype in patients with high on-treatment reactivity. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[20]  K. Huber,et al.  Impact of clopidogrel loading dose on clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, Heart.

[21]  S. Kaul,et al.  ACCF/AHA Clopidogrel Clinical Alert: Approaches to the FDA “Boxed Warning”: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association , 2010, Circulation.

[22]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Cardiovascular risk in clopidogrel-treated patients according to cytochrome P450 2C19*2 loss-of-function allele or proton pump inhibitor coadministration: a systematic meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  V. Deneer,et al.  Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. , 2010, JAMA.

[24]  Atsushi Kurihara,et al.  Metabolism and Disposition of the Thienopyridine Antiplatelet Drugs Ticlopidine, Clopidogrel, and Prasugrel in Humans , 2010, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[25]  H. McLeod,et al.  Clopidogrel pharmacogenomics and risk of inadequate platelet inhibition: US FDA recommendations. , 2009, Pharmacogenomics.

[26]  J. O’Connell,et al.  Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. , 2009, JAMA.

[27]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Can we override clopidogrel resistance? , 2009, Circulation.

[28]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Genetic variation of CYP2C19 affects both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to clopidogrel but not prasugrel in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease , 2009, European heart journal.

[29]  E. Antman,et al.  Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  J. Ormiston,et al.  The pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel response: an analysis from the PRINC (Plavix Response in Coronary Intervention) trial. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[31]  K. Winters,et al.  Increased Active Metabolite Formation Explains the Greater Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel Compared to High-dose Clopidogrel , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[32]  Kevin P. Bliden,et al.  Clopidogrel for Coronary Stenting Response Variability, Drug Resistance, and the Effect of Pretreatment Platelet Reactivity , 2003, Circulation.