An in vivo study of hindfoot 3D kinetics in stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) flatfoot based on weight-bearing CT scan

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the rotation and translation of each joint in the hindfoot and compare the load response in healthy feet with that in stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) flatfoot by analysing the reconstructive three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) image data during simulated weight-bearing. Methods CT scans of 15 healthy feet and 15 feet with stage II PTTD flatfoot were taken first in a non-weight-bearing condition, followed by a simulated full-body weight-bearing condition. The images of the hindfoot bones were reconstructed into 3D models. The ‘twice registration’ method in three planes was used to calculate the position of the talus relative to the calcaneus in the talocalcaneal joint, the navicular relative to the talus in talonavicular joint, and the cuboid relative to the calcaneus in the calcaneocuboid joint. Results From non- to full-body-weight-bearing condition, the difference in the talus position relative to the calcaneus in the talocalcaneal joint was 0.6° more dorsiflexed (p = 0.032), 1.4° more everted (p = 0.026), 0.9 mm more anterior (p = 0.031) and 1.0 mm more proximal (p = 0.004) in stage II PTTD flatfoot compared with that in a healthy foot. The navicular position difference relative to the talus in the talonavicular joint was 3° more everted (p = 0.012), 1.3 mm more lateral (p = 0.024), 0.8 mm more anterior (p = 0.037) and 2.1 mm more proximal (p = 0.017). The cuboid position difference relative to the calcaneus in the calcaneocuboid joint did not change significantly in rotation and translation (all p ≥ 0.08). Conclusion Referring to a previous study regarding both the cadaveric foot and the live foot, joint instability occurred in the hindfoot in simulated weight-bearing condition in patients with stage II PTTD flatfoot. The method used in this study might be applied to clinical analysis of the aetiology and evolution of PTTD flatfoot, and may inform biomechanical analyses of the effects of foot surgery in the future. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:255–63.

[1]  T. Kubo,et al.  Features of hindfoot 3D kinetics in flat foot in ankle-joint maximal dorsiflexion and plantarflexion , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[2]  K. An,et al.  Kinematics of the Normal Arch of the Foot and Ankle Under Physiologic Loading , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  K. A. Johnson,et al.  Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  J T Deland,et al.  Pes Planus in Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Insufficiency: Asymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Foot , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[5]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Subluxation of the talocalcaneal joint in adults who have symptomatic flatfoot. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  William R Ledoux,et al.  Cadaveric flatfoot model: Ligament attenuation and Achilles tendon overpull , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  Takumi Ikeda,et al.  Three-Dimensional Morphology and Kinematics of the Craniovertebral Junction in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2010, Spine.

[8]  R. Bordelon,et al.  Correction of Hypermobile Flatfoot in Children by Molded Insert , 1980, Foot & ankle.

[9]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Surgery of the Foot and Ankle , 1993 .

[10]  T. Nishimura,et al.  In vivo segmental motion of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis patients with atlantoaxial subluxation. , 2008, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[11]  K. An,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Normal Ankle and Foot Mobility , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  William R Ledoux,et al.  Effect of foot shape on the three‐dimensional position of foot bones , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  T. Kubo,et al.  Load Response of the Tarsal Bones in Patients with Flatfoot Deformity: In Vivo 3D Study , 2011, Foot & ankle international.

[14]  A. Manoli,et al.  Acquired flatfoot in adults due to dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  A. Scheepers.  The cavus foot. , 1977, South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie.

[16]  K. An,et al.  Effect of foot orthoses on 3-dimensional kinematics of flatfoot: a cadaveric study. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  J. Davids,et al.  Quantitative Segmental Analysis of Weight-Bearing Radiographs of the Foot and Ankle for Children: Normal Alignment , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[18]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Effect of Calcaneal Lengthening on Relationships among the Hindfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot* , 1993, Foot & ankle.

[19]  K. An,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Flatfoot Deformity: Cadaver Study , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[20]  Eric P. Lorenz,et al.  Three-Dimensional In Vivo Measurement of Lumbar Spine Segmental Motion , 2006, Spine.

[21]  T. Kubo,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis of Hindfoot Kinematics , 2009, Foot & ankle international.

[22]  D. Pearce,et al.  Weightbearing CT Scan of Severe Flexible Pes Planus Deformities , 2008, Foot & ankle international.

[23]  J. Johnson,et al.  Arthrodesis techniques in the management of stage II and III acquired adult flatfoot deformity. , 2005, Instructional course lectures.