Classification of different knowledge management development approaches of SMEs

There is established evidence to suggest that small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face different knowledge management (KM) challenges to larger firms. There is emerging theory and practice concerning KM in SMEs as a whole. SMEs may not, however, be an homogeneous group when addressing KM. The study's objective was to investigate whether there are different approaches towards KM development within SMEs. The responses of 33 SMEs to a 60-item structured analysis of KM practices were analysed using hierarchical cluster analysis, ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparisons of means. Four distinct configurations of practices were identified. These were the KM practices of ‘unengaged’ businesses, ‘comprehensive KM practice’ businesses, ‘knowledge-ownership oriented’ businesses and ‘learning and co-production oriented’ businesses. These different groups of SMEs appear to approach KM in fundamentally different ways. The categorisation provides a useful framework for addressing the take-up of KM initiatives in SMEs.

[1]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Knowledge, learning and IT support in a small software company , 2001, ECIS.

[2]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Stages of Growth for Knowledge Management Technology in Law Firms , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Segmenting support for small and medium enterprises , 2001 .

[4]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  SME and large organisation perceptions of knowledge management: comparisons and contrasts , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  David J. Storey,et al.  Exploring the link, among small firms, between management training and firm performance: a comparison between the UK and other OECD countries , 2004 .

[6]  R. Ruggles.  The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice , 1998 .

[7]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  Dynamic knowledge-related learning processes in internationalizing high-tech SMEs , 2004 .

[8]  G. G. Meredith,et al.  Relationships among Owner / Manager Personal Values , Business Strategies , and Enterprise Performance by , 2007 .

[9]  Syeda-Masooda Mukhtar.  Differences in Male and Female Management Characteristics: A Study of Owner-Manager Businesses , 2002 .

[10]  A. Bounfour,et al.  The Management of Intangibles: The Organisation's Most Valuable Assets , 2003 .

[11]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[12]  J. Sparrow,et al.  Decision Tendencies of Entrepreneurs and Small Business Risk Management Practices , 2000 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[14]  Pattarawan Prasarnphanich,et al.  Understanding the Antecedents of Effective Knowledge Management: The Importance of a Knowledge-Centered Culture , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[15]  Roelof P. uit Beijerse.  Knowledge management in small and medium-sized companies: knowledge , 2003 .

[16]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[17]  Barriers to survival and growth in UK small firms , 2000 .

[18]  Lynn M. Martin,et al.  SME Ownership Succession - Business Support and Policy Implications , 2002 .

[19]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[20]  Camille Carrier,et al.  The Training and Development Needs of Owner-Managers of Small Businesses with Export Potential , 1999 .

[21]  J. Sparrow.  Knowledge in Organizations: Access to Thinking at Work , 1998 .

[22]  Athanasios Hadjimanolis,et al.  A Resource-based View of Innovativeness in Small Firms , 2000 .

[23]  Murray Sinclair,et al.  A framework for organisational readiness for knowledge management , 2004 .