LPV techniques for control of an inverted pendulum

The authors present a comprehensive application of linear fractional transformation and polytopic control techniques to the control of an arm-driven inverted pendulum, The particular interest of this application lies in the fact that all ingredients of the design problem have to be taken into account; from the specifications up to the constraints inherent to real-world implementations. In this context, it has been shown that currently available synthesis methodologies, such as μ and LPV techniques, may fail to provide acceptable answers, A major obstacle is undoubtedly the implementation constraint that puts hard limitations on the controller dynamics, These limitations are generally difficult to handle within the usual formulation of LPV control techniques. It has been shown that a suitable extension of these techniques including LMI region constraints on the closed-loop dynamics can overcome this difficulty. When implementable, it has been observed that LPV controllers outperform fixed μ controllers both in robustness and performance. These observations were confirmed by simulations but more importantly by a number of records on the physical experiment.

[1]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Self-scheduled H∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: a design example , 1995, Autom..

[2]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  A primal—dual potential reduction method for problems involving matrix inequalities , 1995, Math. Program..

[3]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  Pascal Gahiriet General-purpose LMI Solvers with Benchmarks , 1993 .

[5]  Anders Helmersson,et al.  Methods for robust gain scheduling , 1995 .

[6]  G. Scorletti,et al.  Improved linear matrix inequality conditions for gain scheduling , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  The LMI control toolbox , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[9]  Carsten W. Scherer,et al.  Mixed H/sub 2//H/sub /spl infin// control for linear parametrically varying systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Method of centers for minimizing generalized eigenvalues , 1993, Linear Algebra and its Applications.

[11]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control , 1994 .

[12]  P. Apkarian,et al.  Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[13]  A. Tits,et al.  Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics , 1991 .

[14]  C. Scherer Mixed H2/H∞ Control , 1995 .

[15]  A. Packard Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations , 1994 .

[16]  Tetsuya Iwasaki,et al.  All controllers for the general H∞ control problem: LMI existence conditions and state space formulas , 1994, Autom..

[17]  P. Gahinet,et al.  H∞ design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..