Estimating exchange curve for inventory management through evolutionary multi-objective optimization

Inventory management involves trade-offs between conflicting objectives such as cost minimization and service level maximization. The trade-off analysis of cycle stock investment and workload, so called the exchange curve, possibly dates back to several decades ago. These analyses seldom formulated inventory trade-offs as a multi-objective optimization problem and their solution procedures were all based on single objective optimization. To our best knowledge, there do exist some studies that propose non-classical approach to multi-objective inventory management. However, some of the objectives in earlier studies are not conflicted each other such that the multi-objective models were not properly justified. In this paper, a bi-objective inventory management model without redundancy is discussed first. Then a solution procedure based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization is introduced to effectively solve the fixed order model. The results show that the intrinsic multi-objective approach can find efficient policies of order size and safety factor simultaneously without estimating shortage cost or service level. Moreover, a fitted exchange curve of cost and service is useful in determining the best customer service possible for the given investment in inventory management. The cost-service trade-off can be observed in a single run of an iterative computation, so that it is more appropriate for the practice of inventory management.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[2]  Ching-Shih Tsou,et al.  Multi-objective inventory planning using MOPSO and TOPSIS , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  C.-H. Kao,et al.  Multi-objective inventory control using electromagnetism-like meta-heuristic , 2008 .

[4]  J Puerto,et al.  Bicriteria trade-off analysis in a two-echelon inventory/distribution system , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Inventory management and production planning and scheduling , 1998 .

[6]  Masoud Rabbani,et al.  A multi-objective particle swarm optimization for project selection problem , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Raymond P. Lutz,et al.  Decision rules for inventory management , 1967 .

[8]  Guo-Ping Liu,et al.  Multiobjective Optimisation And Control , 2008 .

[9]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[10]  C.A. Coello Coello,et al.  MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[11]  Ching-Shih Tsou,et al.  An Improved Particle Swarm Pareto Optimizer with Local Search and Clustering , 2006, SEAL.

[12]  Susmita Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Solving conflicting bi-objective facility location problem by NSGA II evolutionary algorithm , 2010 .

[13]  James H. Bookbinder,et al.  Multicriteria Trade-Offs in a Warehouse/Retailer System , 1992 .

[14]  M. K. Starr,et al.  Inventory control: Theory and practice , 1962 .

[15]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective portfolio optimization in practical context , 2008, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[16]  H. Schneider,et al.  Resolving a multi-item inventory problem with unknown cost , 1982 .

[17]  Per Joakim Agrell A multicriteria framework for inventory control , 1995 .

[18]  M. W. B. Townsend Decision Rules for Inventory Management , 1968 .

[19]  Ching-Shih Tsou,et al.  Evolutionary Pareto optimizers for continuous review stochastic inventory systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  E. S. Gardner,et al.  Using Optimal Policy Surfaces to Analyze Aggregate Inventory Tradeoffs , 1979 .