How to rate the new glasses-free experience : subjective quality assessment methodologies for experiments on light field displays

Novel forms of 3D visualization are rising, where users no longer need to rely on additional equipment, such as special glasses or head gears, in order to properly perceive the visualized content. One particularly notable type of these systems are light field displays. User experience on such glasses-free displays is just as important as on any visualization technology, and thus researchers conduct experiments to evaluate it. While there are standardized techniques for conventional 2D and stereoscopic 3D displays, at the time of this paper, there are no standards for measuring the user’s Quality of Experience on these displays. In this paper, we discuss the current state of experimental methodologies used to assess subjective perceived quality on light field displays. The discussion also calls attention to the special considerations which are typical for such 3D visualizations but not present in different systems. Keywords—Quality of Experience; Light Field Display; Perceived quality; Subjective quality assessment methodologies; Experimental test conditions; Subjective rating scales; Viewing distance; Parallax effect

[1]  Frédéric Dufaux,et al.  Subjective evaluation of Super Multi-View compressed contents on high-end light-field 3D displays , 2015 .

[2]  A. Gotchev,et al.  QUALITY MEASUREMENTS OF 3 D LIGHT-FIELD DISPLAYS Péter , 2014 .

[3]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  NEW REQUIREMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR 3DTV , 2010 .

[4]  Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems , 2015 .

[5]  David Kane,et al.  The rate of change of vergence–accommodation conflict affects visual discomfort , 2014, Vision Research.

[6]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[7]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Perceived quality of angular resolution for light field displays and the validy of subjective assessment , 2016, 2016 International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D).

[8]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Viva la resolution: the perceivable differences between image resolutions for light field displays , 2016 .

[9]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  A new approach to subjectively assess quality of plenoptic content , 2016, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[10]  Sumohana S. Channappayya,et al.  Super-multiview content with high angular resolution: 3D quality assessment on horizontal-parallax lightfield display , 2016, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[11]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Performance comparison of subjective assessment methodologies for Light Field Displays , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT).