The Gender of Organizations

sense, 'out there', but only insofar as they are instantiated in specific practices. Giddens's critique of structural approaches within sociology is of special importance here. Giddens (1984) argued that structures do not exist except insofar as they are drawn upon by human agents in their social activities. Taken in this sense, structures could best be seen as the 'rules and resources recursively involved in institutions' (Giddens, 1984:24). By taking this step Giddens directly linked structures to specific institutional and organizational practices: in order to examine structures it was necessary to look at institutions, how these drew upon structural resources, and how in turn the institution shaped structures. Giddens's critique ran parallel, in many ways, to that of Foucault. In the 1970s Foucault argued that power should not be seen as the product of a stratifying system which is located in the macro structures of society. Rather, power should be seen in 'relational' terms, as a set of discourses and strategies operating in particular contexts. Power is not a 'single, all-encompassing strategy' (Foucault, 1984:103), but works through specific institutions. Much of Foucault's work comprised detailed studies of institutional changes and their linked transformation of power relations: in mental asylums (Foucault, 1961), hospitals and clinics (Foucault, 1965), and prisons (Foucault, 1977). In these cases he

[1]  R. Crompton,et al.  White-collar Proletariat: Deskilling and Gender in Clerical Work , 1984 .

[2]  David L. Collinson,et al.  Sexuality in the workplace: the domination of men's sexuality , 1989 .

[3]  A. Gouldner Patterns Of Industrial Bureaucracy , 1954 .

[4]  Kathy E. Ferguson The feminist case against bureaucracy , 1984 .

[5]  Rosemary Crompton,et al.  White-collar Proletariat: Deskilling and Gender in Clerical Work , 1984 .

[6]  S. Walby Theorising Patriarchy , 1989 .

[7]  M. Savage,et al.  Property, Bureaucracy and Culture: Middle Class Formation in Contemporary Britain , 1992 .

[8]  Adrienne Rich,et al.  Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence , 1980, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[9]  M. Foucault,et al.  Madness and civilization : a history of insanity in the age of reason , 1966 .

[10]  Jeff Hearn,et al.  'Sex' at 'Work': The Power and Paradox of Organization Sexuality , 1987 .

[11]  S. Cohn The Process of Occupational Sex-Typing , 2018 .

[12]  R. Pringle,et al.  Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power and Work , 1989 .

[13]  R. Bologh Love or Greatness: Max Weber and Masculine Thinking, a Feminist Inquiry , 1990 .

[14]  S. Cohn The Process of Occupational Sex Typing , 1985 .

[15]  D. Smith Women's Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology* , 1974 .

[16]  Zillah R. Eisenstein The radical future of liberal feminism , 1981 .

[17]  A. Witz,et al.  From ‘family labour’ to ‘family wage'? The case of women's labour in nineteenth‐century coalmining∗ , 1988 .

[18]  G. Burrell Sex and Organizational Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  Joan Acker Women and Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  M. Foucault The Birth of the Clinic , 1963 .

[21]  R. Connell,et al.  Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy, and the State , 1989 .

[22]  D. Smith,et al.  The everyday world as problematic , 1987 .

[23]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[24]  Anne Witz,et al.  PATRIARCHY AND PROFESSIONS , 1992 .

[25]  N. Hartsock The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism , 2019, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays.