Quantitative analysis of Neanderthal temporal bone morphology using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics.

The temporal bone is the location of several traits thought to differentiate Neanderthals from modern humans, including some proposed Neanderthal-derived traits. Most of these, however, are difficult to measure and are usually described qualitatively. This study applied the techniques of geometric morphometrics to the complex morphology of the temporal bone, in order to quantify the differences observed between Neanderthal and modern human anatomy. Two hundred and seventy modern human crania were measured, representing 9 populations of 30 individuals each, and spanning the extremes of the modern human geographical range. Twelve Neanderthal specimens, as well as Reilingen, Kabwe, Skhul 5, Qafzeh 9, and 4 Late Paleolithic European specimens, were included in the fossil sample. The data were collected in the form of three-dimensional (3-D) landmark coordinates, and specimen configurations were superimposed using generalized Procrustes analysis. The fitted coordinates were then analyzed by an array of multivariate statistical methods, including principal components analysis, canonical variates analysis, and Mahalanobis D(2). The temporal bone landmark analysis was very successful in separating Neanderthals from modern humans. Neanderthals were separated from modern humans in both the principal components and canonical variates analyses. They were much further in Mahalanobis distances from all modern human populations than any two modern human groups were from each other. Most of the previously described temporal bone traits contributed to this separation.

[1]  D. Slice Landmark coordinates aligned by procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[2]  A. P. S. Luca A re-examination of presumed Neandertal-like fossils , 1978 .

[3]  P. Mellars The fate of the Neanderthals , 1998, Nature.

[4]  F. Weidenreich,et al.  The skull of Sinanthropus pekinensis : a comparative study on a primitive hominid skull , 1943 .

[5]  W. Howells,et al.  Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo , 1992 .

[6]  L. Freedman BOOK REVIEW: "The Evolution of Modern Human Diversity: a Study of Cranial Variation" by Marta Mirazón Lahr , 1996 .

[7]  P. O'higgins,et al.  Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three‐dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  F J Rohlf,et al.  Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  I. Tattersall,et al.  Toward distinguishing Homo neanderthalensis from Homo sapiens, and vice versa , 1996 .

[10]  C. Stringer,et al.  A multivariate analysis of Pleistocene hominids: testing hypothesis of European origins. , 1997, Journal of human evolution.

[11]  K. Harvati The Neanderthal problem : 3-dimensional geometric morphometric models of cranial shape variation within and among species , 2001 .

[12]  O. Pearson Postcranial remains and the origin of modern humans , 2000 .

[13]  M. Boule L'homme fossile de la Chapelle-aux-Saints , 1909 .

[14]  J. Sackett,et al.  Neanderthal Man and Homo sapiens in Central and Eastern Europe [and Comments and Reply] , 1969, Current Anthropology.

[15]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Morphometric Spaces, Shape Components and the Effects of Linear Transformations , 1996 .

[16]  F. Smith,et al.  Sexual differences in European Neanderthal crania with special reference to the Krapina remains , 1980 .

[17]  J. McKee,et al.  Variability of the hominid juxtamastoid eminence and associated basicranial features , 1991 .

[18]  R. M. Taxman INCIDENCE AND SIZE OF THE JUXTAMASTOID EMINENCE IN MODERN CRANIA. , 1963, American journal of physical anthropology.

[19]  C. Stringer Population relationships of later Pleistocene hominids: A multivariate study of available crania , 1974 .

[20]  Santiago Genoveis The Problem of the Sex of Certain Fossil Hominids, with Special Reference to the Neandertal Skeletons from Spy , 1954 .

[21]  鈴木 尚,et al.  The Amud man and his cave site , 1970 .

[22]  B. Arensburg Silvana CONDEMI, 1992 - Les Hommes fossiles de Saccopastore et leurs relations phylogénétiques. , 1993 .

[23]  Ofer Bar-Yosef,et al.  Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans , 1991 .

[24]  G. Bräuer,et al.  Late archaic and modern Homo sapiens from Europe, Africa, and Southwest Asia: Craniometric comparisons and phylogenetic implications , 1990 .

[25]  M. Elyaqtine L'os temporal chez Homo erectus et Homo sapiens ; variabilité et évolution , 1996 .

[26]  C. Stringer,et al.  Upper Pleistocene Hominid Evolution in South-Central Europe: A Review of the Evidence and Analysis of Trends [and Comments and Reply] , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[27]  W. Howells,et al.  Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference Among Recent Human Populations , 1975 .

[28]  M. Wolpoff,et al.  The Krapina hominids : an illustrated catalog of skeletal collection , 1988 .

[29]  I. Martínez,et al.  The temporal bones from Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). A phylogenetic approach. , 1997, Journal of human evolution.

[30]  F. Spencer,et al.  The Origins of modern humans : a world survey of the fossil evidence , 1984 .

[31]  E. Carbonell,et al.  Three new human skulls from the Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site in Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain , 1993, Nature.

[32]  D. Dean The Middle Pleistocene Homo erectus/H. sapiens transition : new evidence from space curve statistics , 1993 .

[33]  C. Stringer Reconstructing recent human evolution. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  J. Radovčić,et al.  Krapina 1: a juvenile Neandertal from the early late Pleistocene of Croatia. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  Lucia Allen Yaroch,et al.  Shape analysis using the thin‐plate spline: Neanderthal cranial shape as an example , 1996 .

[36]  D. Slice Three-Dimensional Generalized Resistant Fitting and the Comparison of Least-Squares and Resistant-Fit Residuals , 1996 .

[37]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  D. Gentry Steele,et al.  The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton , 1988 .

[39]  M. Lahr The Evolution of Modern Human Diversity: A Study of Cranial Variation , 1996 .

[40]  J. Hublin,et al.  On the phylogenetic position of the pre-Neandertal specimen from Reilingen, Germany. , 1998, Journal of human evolution.

[41]  I. Tattersall,et al.  Significance of some previously unrecognized apomorphies in the nasal region of Homo neanderthalensis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  L. F. Marcus,et al.  The Sambungmacan 3 Homo erectus calvaria: A comparative morphometric and morphological analysis , 2001, The Anatomical record.