Ist die Vergütung von Managern im Zeitablauf flexibler geworden?

SummaryAcademic researchers as well as business media criticise the relative high share of fixed salaries of total remuneration of German top management. This study analyses the development of management compensation over ten years (1987–1996). The data is based on published information from 149 firms, which leads to overall 1093 observations. Evidence is found for the hypothesis, that management compensation has become more profit-related over time. In addition there is evidence that the “Aufsichtsrate” fail to penalize the executive boards for poor financial performance.

[1]  Trond E. Olsen,et al.  Limited intertemporal commitment and job design , 1996 .

[2]  Shorey Peterson,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property. , 1933 .

[3]  S. Kaplan Top Executives, Turnover and Firm Performance in Germany , 1993 .

[4]  John F. Boschen,et al.  You Can Pay Me Now and You Can Pay Me Later: The Dynamic Response of Executive Compensation to Firm Performance , 1995 .

[5]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  AGGREGATION AND LINEARITY IN THE PROVISION OF INTERTEMPORAL INCENTIVES , 1987 .

[6]  E. Fama Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[7]  Brian G. M. Main,et al.  Top executive pay and performance , 1991 .

[8]  R. Radner Monitoring Cooperative Agreements in a Repeated Principal-Agent Relationship , 1981 .

[9]  Richard A. Lambert Long-Term Contracts and Moral Hazard , 1983 .

[10]  John Vickers,et al.  Performance Comparisons and Dynamic Incentives , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  George P. Baker,et al.  Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts , 1993 .

[12]  Joachim Schwalbach,et al.  Managervergütung und Unternehmenserfolg , 1995 .

[13]  R. Radner Repeated Principal-Agent Games with Discounting , 1985 .

[14]  P. Joskow,et al.  CEO Pay and Firm Performance: Dynamics, Asymmetries, and Alternative Performance Measures , 1994 .

[15]  S. Shavell Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship , 1979 .

[16]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives , 1990 .

[17]  G. Baker Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  On the Theory of Oligopoly , 1958 .

[19]  Margaret Meyer,et al.  Cooperation and competition in organizations: A dynamic perspective , 1995 .

[20]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[21]  Steven N. Kaplan,et al.  Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance: A Comparison of Japan and the United States , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers , 1989 .

[23]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .