A multifaceted strategy using mobile technology to assist rural primary healthcare doctors and frontline health workers in cardiovascular disease risk management: protocol for the SMARTHealth India cluster randomised controlled trial

BackgroundBlood Pressure related disease affected 118 million people in India in the year 2000; this figure will double by 2025. Around one in four adults in rural India have hypertension, and of those, only a minority are accessing appropriate care. Health systems in India face substantial challenges to meet these gaps in care, and innovative solutions are needed.MethodsWe hypothesise that a multifaceted intervention involving capacity strengthening of primary healthcare doctors and non-physician healthcare workers through use of a mobile device-based clinical decision support system will result in improved blood pressure control for individuals at high risk of a cardiovascular disease event when compared with usual healthcare. This intervention will be implemented as a stepped wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial in 18 primary health centres and 54 villages in rural Andhra Pradesh involving adults aged ≥40 years at high cardiovascular disease event risk (approximately 15,000 people). Cardiovascular disease event risk will be calculated based on World Health Organisation/International Society of Hypertension’s region-specific risk charts. Cluster randomisation will occur at the level of the primary health centres. Outcome analyses will be conducted blinded to intervention allocation.Expected outcomesThe primary study outcome is the difference in the proportion of people meeting guideline-recommended blood pressure targets in the intervention period vs. the control period. Secondary outcomes include mean reduction in blood pressure levels; change in other cardiovascular disease risk factors, including body mass index, current smoking, reported healthy eating habits, and reported physical activity levels; self-reported use of blood pressure and other cardiovascular medicines; quality of life (using the EQ-5D); and cardiovascular disease events (using hospitalisation data). Trial outcomes will be accompanied by detailed process and economic evaluations.SignificanceThe findings are likely to inform policy on a scalable strategy to overcome entrenched inequities in access to effective healthcare for under-served populations in low and middle income country settings.Trial registrationClinical Trial Registry India CTRI/2013/06/003753.

[1]  J. Hughes,et al.  Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  William DuMouchel,et al.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[3]  Patricia Mechael,et al.  Barriers and Gaps Affecting mHealth in Low and Middle Income Countries: Policy White Paper , 1970 .

[4]  R. Dandona,et al.  The Rural Andhra Pradesh Cardiovascular Prevention Study (RAPCAPS): a cluster randomized trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Bruce Neal,et al.  Chronic diseases now a leading cause of death in rural India--mortality data from the Andhra Pradesh Rural Health Initiative. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Krishna D Rao,et al.  Human resources for health in India , 2011, The Lancet.

[7]  S. Michie,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[8]  K. Shojania,et al.  The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Sanjay Kinra,et al.  Sociodemographic patterning of non-communicable disease risk factors in rural India: a cross sectional study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  N. Ford,et al.  A systematic review of task- shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa , 2010, Human resources for health.

[11]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[12]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Fatal and Nonfatal Cardiovascular Disease and the Use of Therapies for Secondary Prevention in a Rural Region of India , 2009, Circulation.

[13]  B. Neal,et al.  Recalibration of a Framingham risk equation for a rural population in India , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[14]  J. Jonas,et al.  Prevalence, awareness, control, and associations of arterial hypertension in a rural central India population: the Central India Eye and Medical Study. , 2010, American journal of hypertension.

[15]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Rohina Joshi,et al.  An Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool to Assist Primary Care Providers in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management: Development and Mixed Methods Evaluation , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  V. Elson A RACE AGAINST TIME , 1998 .

[18]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Bela Shah,et al.  Responding to the threat of chronic diseases in India , 2005, The Lancet.

[20]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[21]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Association of Diet, Exercise, and Smoking Modification With Risk of Early Cardiovascular Events After Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2010, Circulation.

[22]  Vikram Patel,et al.  Chronic diseases and injuries in India , 2011, The Lancet.

[23]  Nikhil Tandon,et al.  Review of Electronic Decision-Support Tools for Diabetes Care: A Viable Option for Low- and Middle-Income Countries? , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.