Rapid Data Assimilation in the Indoor Environment: Theory and Examples from Real-Time Interpretation of Indoor Plumes of Airborne Chemical

Releases of acutely toxic airborne contaminants in or near a building can lead to significant human exposures unless prompt response measures are identified and implemented. Possible responses include conflicting options, such as shutting the ventilation system off versus running it in a purge (100 percent outside air) mode, or having occupants evacuate versus sheltering in place. The right choice depends in part on quickly identifying the source location, the amount released, and the likely future dispersion of the pollutant. This paper summarizes recent developments to provide such estimates in real time using an approach called Bayesian Monte Carlo updating. This approach rapidly interprets measurements of airborne pollutant concentrations from multiple sensors placed in the building, and computes best estimates and uncertainties of the release conditions. The algorithm is fast, and can continuously update the estimates as measurements stream in from sensors. As an illustration, two specific applications of the approach are described.

[1]  Pinsky Pf,et al.  A model to evaluate past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. , 1998 .

[2]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Bayesian Environmental Policy Decisions: Two Case Studies , 1996 .

[3]  J S Evans,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of uncertainty reduction in environmental health risk management. , 1987, JAPCA.

[4]  Michael D. Sohn,et al.  Evaluating sensor characteristics for real-time monitoring of high-risk indoor contaminant releases , 2006 .

[5]  Helmut E. Feustel,et al.  COMIS—an international multizone air-flow and contaminant transport model , 1998 .

[6]  P. Pinsky,et al.  A model to evaluate past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. , 1998, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[7]  M. Sohn,et al.  Rapidly Locating and Characterizing Pollutant Releases in Buildings , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[9]  David W. Dilks,et al.  Development of Bayesian Monte Carlo techniques for water quality model uncertainty , 1992 .

[10]  M. Sohn,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in site characterization using Bayes Monte Carlo methods. , 2000 .

[11]  Heidar A. Malki,et al.  Control Systems Technology , 2001 .

[12]  Clifford Federspiel,et al.  Estimating the inputs of gas transport processes in buildings , 1997, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  R. German Sintering theory and practice , 1996 .

[14]  M J Small,et al.  Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment , 1980 .

[16]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Updating Uncertainty in an Integrated Risk Assessment: Conceptual Framework and Methods , 1995 .

[17]  Mario Innocenti,et al.  Experimental application of extended Kalman filtering for sensor validation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[18]  A C Taylor,et al.  The value of animal test information in environmental control decisions. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Mohinder S. Grewal,et al.  Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice , 1993 .