Investigation of Select Ergonomic Interventions for Farm Youth. Part 2: Wheelbarrows

ABSTRACT Previous research has provided evidence that farm youth performing farm chores may be at risk of developing a low back musculoskeletal injury. In order to reduce these risks, effective interventions for reducing the stressors that cause the injuries are needed. The objective of the current study was to investigate alternative wheelbarrow styles as an intervention for youth working to transfer material on the farm with respect to trunk motion and perceived exertion. A lumbar motion monitor was used to capture three-dimensional trunk kinematics while several wheelbarrow tasks (e.g., pushing, pushing over bump, and dumping) were performed by youth. Ratings of perceived exertion and comfort of use were also assessed. Results indicated a reduction in the sagittal trunk flexion and velocity was achieved by adding a push bar to the handles, in combination with three-wheels, or utilizing adjustable handles. However, these alterations had little impact in the predicted low back disorder risk levels. Additionally, the youths' perceptions of risk and exertion levels were greater for these alternative wheelbarrows than for the regular wheelbarrow. Therefore, the mismatch between perception and kinematic response will probably affect usage of the alternative wheelbarrows. While the results indicate that alternative wheelbarrow designs can reduce the awkward postures and motions during wheelbarrow tasks, further research into the effectiveness of these interventions, including spine loading and long long-term use, is necessary.

[1]  W S Marras,et al.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[2]  M. Heliövaara,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of low-back pain in middle-aged farmers. , 1995, Occupational medicine.

[3]  J R Wilkins,et al.  Physical demands and low-back injury risk among children and adolescents working on farms. , 2004, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[4]  G. Borg Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  T R Waters,et al.  Job hazards for musculoskeletal disorders for youth working on farms. , 2000, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[6]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics , 1992 .

[7]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[8]  L J Chapman,et al.  Musculoskeletal discomfort, injuries, and tasks accomplished by children and adolescents in Wisconsin fresh market vegetable production. , 2003, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[9]  H. Lindberg,et al.  Coxarthrosis in farmers. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Susan E Kotowski,et al.  Investigation of Select Ergonomic Interventions for Farm Youth. Part 1: Shovels , 2009, Journal of agromedicine.

[11]  K. Palmer,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders in farmers and farm workers. , 2002, Occupational medicine.